File talk:Lisbon - Castelo do São Jorge & Largo Martim Moniz (1968).jpg

 

Great!

• @DarwIn: Does this mean that {{PD-Portugal-URAA}} can be used according to what’s plainly said there, no need to check a bunch of other copyright law desicussions and keep fingers crossed?
• @King of Hearts and DarwIn: When you have time, please undelete also the 2023-01-03 01:03:30 temp upload showing the back ot the postcard.

-- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 14:30, 9 December 2023 (UTC)

@Tuvalkin To be frank, I don't even understand why we are discussing a court decision in Hamburg in the context of the Portuguese law, and the jurists and lawyers I've been talking to also get puzzled with that question. Since what is in {{PD-Portugal-URAA}} is ipsis verbis what is stated in our copyright law, and there is not a shred of evidence countering that, quite the opposite, I don't have any doubts that this should be treated like all other PD cases we have here. Darwin ^Ahoy! 14:55, 9 December 2023 (UTC)

Hmm, so those 1968 Coimbra tram photos Tm lost his wits over to have deleted… Would be lovely to undelete them, whenever I manage to find those discussions. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 15:02, 9 December 2023 (UTC)

Pois, se calhar, não. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 15:11, 9 December 2023 (UTC)

@Tuvalkin Sim, elas têm de ter sido publicadas em Portugal, embora a data de corte conte a partir da criação, e não da publicação. Ou seja, mesmo que as fotos sejam inéditas, se elas tiverem sido legitimamente publicadas até há 25 anos atrás (prazo de proteção das obras inéditas) já estão no domínio público, desde que tiradas até 30 de junho de 1970. Darwin ^Ahoy! 20:32, 9 December 2023 (UTC)