File talk:Google Chrome.png
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
 | This file was nominated for deletion on September 3, 2008 but was kept. If you are thinking about re-nominating it for deletion, please read that discussion first. |
| This file was nominated for deletion on 10 January 2011 but was kept. If you are thinking about re-nominating it for deletion, please read that discussion first. |
Appeal to speedy deletion
[edit]
Please see the previous deletion discussions linked above on why this file is not a copyright violation. In the future, consider doing this before nominating a file. Artyom (talk) 09:16, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
- Seriously, the admins running this project are the worst in Wikimedia projects. Can't they synchronize their bloody decisions? One deletes Chrome images and one keeps them.
- Actually, in this case, both the deleter and the keeper is Jcb. (See the deletion log here.)
- Jcb, would you please kindly explain yourself?
- —Codename Lisa (talk) 10:38, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
- Given the huge number of DRs we close you cannot reasonably expect that you will never find inconsistencies. And do you really expect me to compare all of my decisions even with decisions I took in 2011? We are doing our best and we are understaffed. At this moment, every week the number of open DRs is increasing with about 500. So to stop be backlogs from growing, we need to close 500 more DRs every week than we are currently capable of. Unfair accusations are not helpful in this. Not a single admin is perfect. Please learn to live with this, it's not gonna change. Jcb (talk) 12:27, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
- @Jcb: I am afraid that's cause and effect, not a pretext: Incongruity in closure decisions multiplies your load. This is a proven fact, taught in the law school. When the community believes that different judges close the cases differently, it repeatedly seeks legal appeal, in hopes of getting lucky with the next judge. (Remember that legal appeal cost a lot too! But Commons's appeal costs zero.) In this case, this Chrome image has bothered you alone six times. If the decisions of you and your fellow admins were based on method (e.g. a firm rule that screenshots of non-free image, unless extremely simple, have no place here) the situation that you say won't change, would have changed. After a while, the community won't upload such things.
- —Codename Lisa (talk) 03:54, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
- Given the huge number of DRs we close you cannot reasonably expect that you will never find inconsistencies. And do you really expect me to compare all of my decisions even with decisions I took in 2011? We are doing our best and we are understaffed. At this moment, every week the number of open DRs is increasing with about 500. So to stop be backlogs from growing, we need to close 500 more DRs every week than we are currently capable of. Unfair accusations are not helpful in this. Not a single admin is perfect. Please learn to live with this, it's not gonna change. Jcb (talk) 12:27, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
