File talk:Gabrielle Daleman at 2017 Four Continents.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Creative Commons?
[edit]- @Trijnstel: I checked the ticket#2008012510003504 and I did not see the owner saying yes to "Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0". Am I missing anything here? Thanks. --Mhhossein talk 11:59, 6 October 2017 (UTC)
- @Mhhossein: They agreed to license it under GFDL and all his other images were relicensed. So I decided to also use {{GFDL|migration=relicense}}. Perhaps we could ask if they agree to use their photos under cc-by-sa? Or should we change relicense into opt-out? What do you think? Trijnsteltalk 16:30, 6 October 2017 (UTC)
- @Trijnstel: Thanks for the response. I would do both! We'd better change relicense into opt-out until we get a response. --Mhhossein talk 16:57, 6 October 2017 (UTC)
- I agree, but not now. I mean, there are so many uploads of this guy. And I already have enough work for now. I don't want to change the license twice. (Will you send them an email btw?) Trijnsteltalk 17:30, 6 October 2017 (UTC)
- @Trijnstel: Sure, I'll take care of that. Given those "many uploads", I agree with that "but not now". --Mhhossein talk 17:11, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
- @Trijnstel: I've now received his "yes" to "Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0" via e-mail. --Mhhossein talk 05:26, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
- @Mhhossein: Thanks! Can you please forward the email to OTRS and merge it with Ticket#2008012510003504 for archive reasons? Trijnsteltalk 22:02, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
- @Trijnstel: I've now received his "yes" to "Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0" via e-mail. --Mhhossein talk 05:26, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
- @Trijnstel: Sure, I'll take care of that. Given those "many uploads", I agree with that "but not now". --Mhhossein talk 17:11, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
- I agree, but not now. I mean, there are so many uploads of this guy. And I already have enough work for now. I don't want to change the license twice. (Will you send them an email btw?) Trijnsteltalk 17:30, 6 October 2017 (UTC)
- @Trijnstel: Thanks for the response. I would do both! We'd better change relicense into opt-out until we get a response. --Mhhossein talk 16:57, 6 October 2017 (UTC)
- @Mhhossein: They agreed to license it under GFDL and all his other images were relicensed. So I decided to also use {{GFDL|migration=relicense}}. Perhaps we could ask if they agree to use their photos under cc-by-sa? Or should we change relicense into opt-out? What do you think? Trijnsteltalk 16:30, 6 October 2017 (UTC)
