File talk:Ejectionseat.jpg
File information
[edit]This file was marked as equivalent to w:Image:Ejectionseat.jpg from en.wikipedia.org according to the NowCommons tag.
This is the edit history for that file's page:
- [2004-03-01T21:45:14Z] Tempshill (Ejection seat)
- [2004-03-01T21:56:26Z] Tempshill (Description and provenance)
- [2004-03-02T21:36:54Z] Tempshill
- [2004-06-04T05:53:51Z] Template namespace initialisation script
- [2004-08-04T17:25:32Z] Tempshill (PD tag changed to PD-USGov)
- [2004-09-30T21:43:15Z] Neutrality ({{PD-USGov-Military}})
- [2004-10-01T22:28:38Z] Neutrality ({{PD-USGov-Military-Air Force}})
- [2006-05-06T23:10:12Z] Ericg (that's definitely not a raptor, though the test itself could have been for raptor equipment)
- [2006-10-09T11:43:05Z] Liftarn
Original title:
- Ejectionseat.jpg
Upload log:
- (del) (cur) 21:45, 1 March 2004 . . Tempshill (Talk | contribs) . . 277×406 (17,813 bytes) (Ejection seat)
Text:
This photograph is of an [[ejection seat]] test in which a mannequin was blasted through the canopy of an [[F-15 Eagle]] during launch.
{{PD-USGov-Military-Air Force}}
[--www.holloman.af.mil/sunburst/2003/april/APRIL%204%20DT.pdf] (PDF file, much higher resolution) It is the "doubletruck" page from the publication "Sunburst", "Serving the Holloman Air Force Base community", dated April 4, 2003. Page 8 of the magazine, at [--www.holloman.af.mil/sunburst/2003/april/April%204.pdf], states, "All photos used are U.S. Air Force photos unless otherwise indicated." The doubletruck photo is labeled "Courtesy photos".
Poccil 15:59, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
It's an F/A-22 Raptor
[edit]Original source, as you can see in the comments, said this was an F/A-22 Raptor. Someone changed it to F-15 Eagle. Changing it back here and on en, though possibly this F-15 comment got propagated to all the other languages' Wikipedias. Tempshill 21:17, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
- The aircraft apears to be the front section of an F-15, minus nose-cone. Note the wedge-shaped air intake. However, I surmise that the seat being tested is for the F-22, thus the confusion. We ought to find the original caption, and quote it directly. - 68.53.215.89 22:28, 6 January 2008 (UTC)