File talk:Dersim region in the mid 1930s German.png

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Dersim, 26.06.1926 tarih ve 404 sayılı Resmî Ceride'de yayımlanan 30.5.1926 tarih ve 877 sayılı Kanunla ilçeye dönüstürülerek Elazıg'a bağlanmıştır.

In short, Dersim became ilçe (kaza = district) in 1926.

Tunceli 04.01.1936 tarih ve 3197 sayılı Resmî Gazete'de yayımlanan 2885 sayılı Kanunla il olmustur.

In short, Tunceli became il (vilayet = province) in 1936.

Takabeg (talk) 04:28, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

So I should change the date to 1936? No problem. NNW (talk) 07:54, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
First of all, could you show us sources ? Does "United States National Imagery and Mapping Agency data" belong to 1936 ?, or 1937 ? Thank you. Takabeg (talk) 08:26, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Who is "us"? NIMA data is used for the rivers, lakes etc. The rest bases on work I did on my own years ago. NNW (talk) 09:41, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Us means every Commons user except you. Takabeg (talk) 09:56, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Are you from German Wikipedia ? If so, I recommend you to consult with de:Benutzer:KureCewlik81. Probably he understands this issue. Cheers. Takabeg (talk) 10:14, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
This map was made together with de:User:Koenraad who is writing about the Middle East, see de:Wikipedia:Kartenwerkstatt/Archiv/2009-03#Historische Karte von Dersim. There the map says Dersim 1937, so I uploaded it with an incorrect name. I'll ask KureCewlik81 if there is any further mistake than the name of this file. NNW (talk) 10:40, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A week has gone, KureCewlik81 didn't answer. So since Tunceli became a province in 1936 it would be correct to rename this file to Vilayet of Dersim 1936 German.png. Are there any other items you want to discuss? NNW (talk) 09:41, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

According to sources, Vilayet of Dersim 1936 German.png is wrong. Takabeg (talk) 11:26, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
And what would be correct? NNW (talk) 13:41, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Another week has gone and no answer to the question what file name would be according to the sources. NNW (talk) 14:39, 14 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A second week has gone, still no answer. "Dispute" means that there are two or more persons thinking different about a matter. But if it is only me here at this talk page there is no reason for the template. I will wait another week. If nothing happens in this time I will remove the template because it is senseless. NNW (talk) 09:41, 23 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

In short there was no "Vilayet of Dersim" in 1935. Takabeg (talk) 17:14, 23 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

As you said above it was founded in 1936. I suggested to move the file to 1936. You said this would be wrong but didn't say why or what would be correct. If you know better than me then I really don't understand why you just don't suggest a better file name. NNW (talk) 17:51, 23 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Last try (after another week): File:Vilayet of Dersim 1937 German.png? I just can guess. Sorry to say, it's getting ridiculous. NNW (talk) 13:28, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

After a discussion with several users at de:WP I suggest File:Dersim region in the mid 1930s German.png. The differences between region and province are too small to be seen in that scale. If there is no evident reason against this name I will move the file. NNW (talk) 18:50, 10 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]