File talk:Cyrtospirifer verneuili lateral.jpg
All of these changes by others are only creating future work for me. Kevmin has removed "fossils from Barvaux" and "Fossils from Liège Province" and changed "Fossils from Belgium" to "Fossils of Belgium". He calls this 'removed overcategorisation'. Lets start with the latter: 'of' means 'owned by', 'from' means 'originated in', which would be correct. There is no point in me correcting it at this moment, all sorts of people add these types of wonderfull 'improvements'. I think this topic calls for a ruling. About the removal of the categories Barvaux and Liège, I think these categories are very usefull now, to help people identify there own finds. I agree that in the end "fossils from Barvaux" should contain at least 2 species, "Fossils from Liège Province" should contain at least 2 locations, and "Fossils from Belgium" should at least contain two provinces. "Fossils from Barvaux" would thus be the right (smallest) category where the 'Cyrtospirifer verneuili' files should be. Removing it does not help, it only means I will have to restore it when I have identified the other finds from that location. Please people, let me try to build a body of fossil images.
Start a discussion about File:Cyrtospirifer verneuili lateral.jpg
Talk pages are where people discuss how to make content on Wikimedia Commons the best that it can be. You can use this page to start a discussion with others about how to improve File:Cyrtospirifer verneuili lateral.jpg.
