File talk:Chili con Carne.jpg

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Question about reversion

[edit]

@L. Beck: Why did you reverse my adding of Category:Cooking to this file? I think this is a good example of cooking. JopkeB (talk) 06:39, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Because it's an over-categorization. "Cooking pots" is part of "cooking". For this reason, there is no need for double categorization here. Lukas Beck (talk) 11:51, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, in general I agree with this reasoning (I have removed myself a lot of categories from files for this reason). But there are a lot of cooking pots in Category:Cooking pots that are empty, or are not on a heating stove and for that reason belong not in Category:Cooking. So in this case I would like to add Category:Cooking. Perhaps there should be a category for empty cooking pots and/or for cooking pots that are actually used for cooking (Cooking with cooking pots)? JopkeB (talk) 16:21, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I think the latter is a good idea. If a category is missing or too inaccurate, it's always a better idea to fix it than to categorize an image twice. Best regards, Lukas Beck (talk) 16:54, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. Then I'll make that category. JopkeB (talk) 08:33, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done. Now the Category:Cooking pots also has again an acceptable number of files (less than 200). Two problems solved in one action. --JopkeB (talk) 08:56, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I like that idea. Thank you! Lukas Beck (talk) 13:37, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]