File talk:Carn Brea.svg

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Fæ took much more than just the data, his contribution ws mainly to add larger labels to the map, the real authors are the OpenStreetMap contributors. Compare http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=50.22109&lon=-5.24887&zoom=15&layers=M

Also, the label A30 does not really show the motorway, I believe. —Preceding unsigned comment was added by 194.47.95.146 (talk) 09:30, 8 June 2012 (UTC) (UTC)[reply]

The A30 is not a motorway. Have you not paused to think that trolling me from IP addresses while your account is blocked is rather self defeating? -- (talk) 20:05, 8 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
OpenStreetMap says that it's the Cornish Main Line, not the A30. The A30 is farther up North (outside of the image's boundaries). --Michaeldsuarez (talk) 20:38, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Michaeldsuarez, considering your campaign against me on EncyclopediaDramatica, don't you think it might be seen as a bit creepy to be seen openly imagestalking me on WikimediaCommons? Thanks -- (talk) 07:51, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
http://wikipediocracy.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=9948#p9948 – I'm not stalking. Pieter Kuiper complained about this image on Wikipediocracy, and I decided not to ignore the problem. --Michaeldsuarez (talk) 11:52, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I note you do not deny this is a campaign. Should you persist, I feel it will become perfectly reasonable to refer to your actions as abusive stalking and to complain about them as such. Thanks -- (talk) 11:57, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not running a campaign. I simply chose to ignore your claim in order to avoid an argument. You're also making a legal threat. --Michaeldsuarez (talk) 12:29, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Nope, no legal threat above, that's in your head. I have made a statement of fact that I will start referring to your behaviour as abusive stalking and complain about it on the most appropriate noticeboard. Thanks -- (talk) 12:41, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not stalking. I'm not watching your contributions. You're accusing me of committing a crime (stalking), so I interpreted that as a legal threat. --Michaeldsuarez (talk) 12:44, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

MDS thought some of Fae's contributions had so little genuine value for the WMF's educational mission that he ridiculed them offsite. He hasn't been alone in doing that, whatever the merits of his opinion may be. It's perfectly legitimate to scrutinize the contributions of an editor who one believes is damaging the project -- indeed, it's pretty much been proven a necessary practice. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (talk) 21:25, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Your claims are baseless. I've never said that Fæ's contributions were devoid of genuine educational value. Many of Fæ's images are in use. --Michaeldsuarez (talk) 22:19, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
You know, I was trying to support you. And I said "some" of his contributions, referring to the images republished on the ED page. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (talk) 01:55, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Please stop putting words in my mouth. Those images were educational; they taught viewers about what BDSM looks like. --Michaeldsuarez (talk) 03:25, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note, 194.47.95.146 has signed other posts on Commons as Pieter Kuiper (talk · contribs), an account currently blocked and actively trolling using IP addresses. -- (talk) 12:49, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]