File talk:Bruce Cooper.png
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
 | This file was nominated for deletion on 18 November 2012 but was kept. If you are thinking about re-nominating it for deletion, please read that discussion first. |
No Copyvio
[edit]
The image has been released by its author Jim Crone at DiscoverGibraltar.com under a compatible sharealike licence. --Gibmetal 77talk 2 me 14:34, 11 November 2012 (UTC)
- Thank you. ACP2011 (talk) 15:07, 11 November 2012 (UTC)
- Where is the proof of this? Don't remove speedy's unless you have proof. Bgwhite (talk) 23:14, 11 November 2012 (UTC)
- Thank you. The proof is on the front page of the DiscoverGibraltar website. Jim Crone has very kindly released his photos under CC-SA-3.0. ACP2011 (talk) 14:46, 12 November 2012 (UTC)
- Again, where is the proof? The front page doesn't say "Jim Crone has very kindly released his photos under CC-SA-3.0.0" Front page says nothing about the cooper photo or anything about cooper. Where in the world does is the actual place where it says the copyright status? Bgwhite (talk) 08:35, 17 November 2012 (UTC)
- Perhaps this is the release being referred to? It is a free license, but the "Gibraltarpedia only" part is a bit confusing. INeverCry 17:39, 17 November 2012 (UTC)
- I guess I can't link directly to it. For the license, see the link at the top of the main page under the Gibraltarpedia logo that says: Please read the additional information and licence details. INeverCry 17:42, 17 November 2012 (UTC)
- It doesn't say "Gibraltarpedia only" anywhere. It does mention he's releasing them under said commons licence so they can be used for Gibraltarpedia, not only Gibraltarpedia. This is irrelevant anyway, all of Jim Crone's photos on the site have been released under a CC-BY-SA licence which is obviously compatible with wiki commons. --Gibmetal 77talk 2 me 21:07, 17 November 2012 (UTC)
- It does say "Please feel free to copy text and images from this website for use in Gibraltarpedia"... Gibraltarpedia only.
- It doesn't say "Gibraltarpedia only" anywhere. It does mention he's releasing them under said commons licence so they can be used for Gibraltarpedia, not only Gibraltarpedia. This is irrelevant anyway, all of Jim Crone's photos on the site have been released under a CC-BY-SA licence which is obviously compatible with wiki commons. --Gibmetal 77talk 2 me 21:07, 17 November 2012 (UTC)
- I guess I can't link directly to it. For the license, see the link at the top of the main page under the Gibraltarpedia logo that says: Please read the additional information and licence details. INeverCry 17:42, 17 November 2012 (UTC)
- Perhaps this is the release being referred to? It is a free license, but the "Gibraltarpedia only" part is a bit confusing. INeverCry 17:39, 17 November 2012 (UTC)
- Again, where is the proof? The front page doesn't say "Jim Crone has very kindly released his photos under CC-SA-3.0.0" Front page says nothing about the cooper photo or anything about cooper. Where in the world does is the actual place where it says the copyright status? Bgwhite (talk) 08:35, 17 November 2012 (UTC)
- Thank you. The proof is on the front page of the DiscoverGibraltar website. Jim Crone has very kindly released his photos under CC-SA-3.0. ACP2011 (talk) 14:46, 12 November 2012 (UTC)
- Where is the proof of this? Don't remove speedy's unless you have proof. Bgwhite (talk) 23:14, 11 November 2012 (UTC)
- So, there is a newspaper site that says it is copyrighted. There is Gibraltarpedia that says CC-BY-SA, but refuses to show any proof. If John Doe puts up a photo and said they received permission from the photographer. The photo would be deleted for copyright. Permission would have to be sent to OTRS to validate the copyright. Why is this case any different than from John Doe's? Bgwhite (talk) 08:22, 18 November 2012 (UTC)
- This is clearly too contentious for speedy deletion, so I've converted it to a COM:DR so the discussion can continue there and get some outside input. January (talk) 18:06, 18 November 2012 (UTC)
