File talk:Balkan 9 vek.png

About the modifications

Since august 8, 2023, according to the works of Bulgarian, Romanian & Serbian historians as Dragan Veselinov Manchov's works (1834-1908) synthetised here: [1] and [2], I take out the confusions “Dniestr”-“Prut” and “Pannonia” (antic roman name)-“Blatnozeria” (slav principality), added details (as Benevento & Salerno duchies, “Honfoglalás” 895, precise themes & islands of the Byzantine Empire in this time - the islands became venetian or genoan later, in the 13-th century, and the entire extent of the First Bulgarian Empire, including “Bulgaria over the Danube” with its intermingled populations, without which, the linguistics of the Slavic, Romance and Albanian languages ​​of the Balkans, as well as the names of regions and peoples from Byzantine or Benedictine sources, becomes inexplicable).
Missing details and mistakes of the original version coming from this map [3] which show the austro-hungarian thesis of “Desert of the Avars” (Avar sivatag) emitted during the 19-th century but reactived since the fall of communism. According with this thesis, the current overborders Magyars (who have become an issue in Hungarian domestic politics with the theme of their historical rights) are historiographically presented in secondary sources as “residual islands” of a Hungarian population that was initially uniform throughout the inner Carpathian arc, but later overwhelmed by “allogenous immigrants”. This thesis denies the presence, at the time of the arrival of the Magyars, of Slavic or Romance populations, affirming that following the massacre of all the Avars by the Carolingians in 805, the Magyars would have found a country devoid of any sedentary inhabitant, despite the attested existence of Slavic states such as Moravia or Blatnozeria and later the “banats” (vassal duchies) of Croatia, Serbia, Wallachians and others with their “seats” and their autonomy.
According to this hungarian thesis of “residual islands”, the diversity of the populations of “millennial Hungary” only began later, from the 13th century, by “immigration from the Balkans”, and would have become “massive" due to the Turkish conquest and then the Habsburgs established their military borders in the 17th century: thus, the Treaty of Trianon would be the culmination of a process of “decline by submersion of the original population”. This mainly electoral theme only marginally impacts Hungary's relations with its seven Austrian, Slovak, Ukrainian, Romanian, Serbian, Croatian and Slovenian neighbors, because the Orbán government respects bilateral treaties and refrains from any territorial claim, limiting itself to culturally supporting the Hungarian minorities of Austrian Burgenland, Slovak Upper Hungary, Ukrainian Subcarpathian Ruthenia, Romanian Transylvania, Serbian Vojvodina, Croatian Slavonia and Slovenian Prekmuria and enabling them to acquire Hungarian citizenship if they ask it. Claude Zygiel (talk) 09:03, 26 September 2023 (UTC)

"Pinkerton" must probably be an artificial intelligence because it automatically reverts in COM:CROP or [4] any modification, even sourced and motivated. It cancels the modifications despite the fact that no rule prohibits modifying an online document, whether it is old and heritage, or modern and digitally created just for Commons, as long as this modification is clearly marked as a derivative work and specifying from which original it derives. It thus restores poorly scanned, stained, darked, erroneous, scientifically or historically inaccurate graphic documents, or biased by extremist or exclusive theses. --2A01:CB1C:821F:A400:F11D:F783:1911:4EC9 19:16, 19 December 2023 (UTC)