File talk:2005feldspar.PNG
Text
[edit]
Could some explain what "This map is consistent with incomplete set of data too as long as the top producer is known" actually means? As it is presently written it is jibberish. For example if it is acknowledged there is an incomplete set of data then it would be better not have anything - remember no data is preferable to bad data.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.153.30.48 (talk • contribs) 22 August 2007
For the image creator: It's great how much work you have done with map diagrams. :) It is possible that readers who don't have prior understanding of the diagrams do not immediately understand all the descriptions. I could maybe help with them if I had a possibility to talk with you more. If you wish me to engage this please send me an email, thank you. User:Rhanyeia 19:12, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
I agree with the first comment. It is wholly unacceptable to have data which is incomplete. This is yet another example of the many flaws of Wikipedia. Publishing such flawed information would never even be considered in proper encyclopdias. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.157.100.199 (talk) 20:02, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
what it means is that the top producer is known, in this case, italy. if data is incomplete, we don't know how much a country produces, but in this type of map, that doesn't detract from displaying availible data. 70.189.30.78 (talk) 17:48, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
