File:US Navy Goa, India IMG 0290 (8023208694).jpg
Original file (600 × 900 pixels, file size: 424 KB, MIME type: image/jpeg)
Captions
Summary
[edit]DescriptionUS Navy Goa, India IMG 0290 (8023208694).jpg |
120914-N-IZ978-005 GOA, INDIA (14SEP2012) The Chief Petty Officer selectees march in to the Chief Petty Officer Pinning Ceremony held onboard while in Goa, India for a port visit. Gridley is currently embarked on a six-month deployment in support of counter-piracy operations. (U.S. Navy photo by Lt.j.g Elijah Waddle/Released) |
Date | |
Source | IMG_0290 |
Author | Naval Surface Warriors |
Licensing
[edit]- You are free:
- to share – to copy, distribute and transmit the work
- to remix – to adapt the work
- Under the following conditions:
- attribution – You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- share alike – If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same or compatible license as the original.
This image was originally posted to Flickr by SurfaceWarriors at https://flickr.com/photos/55244200@N05/8023208694. It was reviewed on 5 April 2016 by FlickreviewR and was confirmed to be licensed under the terms of the cc-by-sa-2.0. |
5 April 2016
File history
Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.
Date/Time | Thumbnail | Dimensions | User | Comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
current | 23:41, 5 April 2016 | 600 × 900 (424 KB) | Hopeful Duck (talk | contribs) | Transferred from Flickr via Flickr2Commons |
You cannot overwrite this file.
File usage on Commons
There are no pages that use this file.
Metadata
This file contains additional information such as Exif metadata which may have been added by the digital camera, scanner, or software program used to create or digitize it. If the file has been modified from its original state, some details such as the timestamp may not fully reflect those of the original file. The timestamp is only as accurate as the clock in the camera, and it may be completely wrong.
Camera manufacturer | Canon |
---|---|
Camera model | Canon EOS 60D |
Exposure time | 1/400 sec (0.0025) |
F-number | f/7.1 |
ISO speed rating | 100 |
Date and time of data generation | 09:00, 14 September 2012 |
Lens focal length | 135 mm |
Horizontal resolution | 240 dpi |
Vertical resolution | 240 dpi |
Software used | Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 3.6 (Windows) |
File change date and time | 15:21, 16 September 2012 |
Exposure Program | Not defined |
Exif version | 2.3 |
Date and time of digitizing | 09:00, 14 September 2012 |
APEX shutter speed | 8.643856 |
APEX aperture | 5.655638 |
APEX exposure bias | 0 |
Maximum land aperture | 5 APEX (f/5.66) |
Subject distance | 17.8 meters |
Metering mode | Pattern |
Flash | Flash did not fire, compulsory flash suppression |
DateTimeOriginal subseconds | 89 |
DateTimeDigitized subseconds | 89 |
Focal plane X resolution | 5,728.1767955801 |
Focal plane Y resolution | 5,808.4033613445 |
Focal plane resolution unit | inches |
Custom image processing | Normal process |
Exposure mode | Auto exposure |
White balance | Auto white balance |
Scene capture type | Standard |
Serial number of camera | 1981121280 |
Lens used | EF-S18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS |
Date metadata was last modified | 00:21, 17 September 2012 |
Unique ID of original document | 9A479A78E50248F5891135BB1A697977 |
IIM version | 4 |