File:Transactions (1880) (14579579210).jpg

Identifier: transactions07opht (find matches)
Title: Transactions
Year: 1880 (1880s)
Authors: Ophthalmological Society of the United Kingdom
Subjects: Ophthalmology
Publisher: London J. & A. Churchill
Contributing Library: Gerstein - University of Toronto
Digitizing Sponsor: University of Toronto

View Book Page: Book Viewer
About This Book: Catalog Entry
View All Images: All Images From Book
Click here to view book online to see this illustration in context in a browseable online version of this book.

Text Appearing Before Image:
ith as much accuracy as could be obtained. Fia. 1.—A larpe semilunar haemorrhage, chiefly below the yellow spot, witha linear margin directed downwards and outwards. A circular whitish spot,with a piuk centre (? slight hsemorrhage), is situated below this, and aroundboth there was some dark mottling. A tortuous vein (reproduced rather toolaige) appeared to be lost in the upper border of the hsemorrhage, but therelative depth of the two could not be ascertained. Fio. 2.—The site of the hsemorrhage is occupied by a smaller white patchwith more irregular margin, round which is some deep pigmentation, due tothe blood colouring matter. Either end of the semiluunr patch was still ofred colour, and the white spot is seen to have become smaller. In additionthere is a fresh white spot above the site of the hajmorrhage. Fig. 3,—In the region of the former haemorrhage can now be detectedonly black pigment irregularly distributed, and further outwards are anumber of biilliantly white spots.
Text Appearing After Image:
-tlQ ^. 1-KK- J Hutchinson J^^del CENTRAL CnOliOIDO-RETlNITIS. 177 bounding the upper and inner limit, i. e. the convexity ofthe hasmorrhage. (Card siyecimen. December 9th, 1886.) Dr. James Anderson stated that he had recently seen acase of large macular hgemorrhage in a fatal case of nephritiswith albuminuric neuro-retinitis. His impression was thatthe haemorrhage was retinal, but he had removed the fundiat the autopsy and would report on the microscopic exam-ination of them, should it throw light on the subject underdiscussion. Mr. Jessop referred to a case recorded by him in the^ Ophth. Soc. Trans./ vol. vi, p. 335, of a large hasmor-rhage below the yellow spot. The haemorrhage had quitecleared up with the exception of some raised white spotsover a retinal vessel towards the periphery, but not in thepart of the retina first affected by the haemorrhage. Therewas no scotoma left now, and the field was normal j vision1%; H. m. 1-5 D. f. Noie.—Mr. Silcock^s case was again exhibited o

Note About Images