File:Traditional morphology examination compared to time-lapse-based morphokinetic examination.jpg
From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Size of this preview: 800 × 452 pixels. Other resolutions: 320 × 181 pixels | 640 × 362 pixels | 1,024 × 579 pixels | 1,594 × 901 pixels.
Original file (1,594 × 901 pixels, file size: 583 KB, MIME type: image/jpeg)
File information
Structured data
Captions
Summary
[edit]DescriptionTraditional morphology examination compared to time-lapse-based morphokinetic examination.jpg | FIGURE 2. Traditional morphology examination compared to time-lapse-based morphokinetic examination. During the traditional microscopic evaluation, the embryologists miss developmental events and stages because they check the embryos once a day (dots … mean the missed/not seen developmental stage). On the other hand, the time-lapse system makes a recording every 10 min, which provides a continuous follow-up. |
Date | |
Source | https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/cell-and-developmental-biology/articles/10.3389/fcell.2023.1177279/full Joo K, Nemes A, Dudas B, Berkes-Bara E, Murber A, Urbancsek J and Fancsovits P (2023) The importance of cytoplasmic strings during early human embryonic development. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 11:1177279. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2023.1177279 |
Author | Joo K, Nemes A, Dudas B, Berkes-Bara E, Murber A, Urbancsek J and Fancsovits P |
This file, which was originally posted to an external website, has not yet been reviewed by an administrator or reviewer to confirm that the above license is valid. See Category:License review needed for further instructions.
|
© 2023 Joo, Nemes, Dudas, Berkes-Bara, Murber, Urbancsek and Fancsovits. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
Licensing
[edit]This file is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.
- You are free:
- to share – to copy, distribute and transmit the work
- to remix – to adapt the work
- Under the following conditions:
- attribution – You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
File history
Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.
Date/Time | Thumbnail | Dimensions | User | Comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
current | 20:47, 28 August 2024 | 1,594 × 901 (583 KB) | Rasbak (talk | contribs) | {{Information |description=FIGURE 2. Traditional morphology examination compared to time-lapse-based morphokinetic examination. During the traditional microscopic evaluation, the embryologists miss developmental events and stages because they check the embryos once a day (dots … mean the missed/not seen developmental stage). On the other hand, the time-lapse system makes a recording every 10 min, which provides a continuous follow-up. |date=2023-07-11 |source= https://www.frontiersin.org/jour... |
You cannot overwrite this file.
File usage on Commons
There are no pages that use this file.
Structured data
Items portrayed in this file
depicts
11 July 2023
image/jpeg
596,879 byte
901 pixel
1,594 pixel
e16840a9a128455b38cbf8a81a4bf7ccaf569102
Hidden categories: