File:The Vanquished Dragon, Church of Bet Giorgis, Lalibela, Ethiopia (3267623815).jpg
Original file (3,024 × 1,998 pixels, file size: 4.07 MB, MIME type: image/jpeg)
Captions
Summary
[edit]DescriptionThe Vanquished Dragon, Church of Bet Giorgis, Lalibela, Ethiopia (3267623815).jpg |
Game over: St. George 1, Dragon 0. As Ethiopian dragons go, this specimen satisfies the basic requirements quite competently, but it doesn't soar to new heights of reptilian loathsomeness or artistic accomplishment. But all the dragons I photographed in Ethiopia, this is only the second I've seen that's been lassooed. You can see the rope just to the left of the lance. So, the tether is an optional element in Ethiopian St. George-vs.-Dragon iconography. I don't know about you, but I would not want to be connected to an irate dragon by a rope of any length. That snaky neck makes a very narrow target for a lance, and I bet the dragon would be writhing and darting all over the place. As a boater, I know it takes more than one line to secure a vessel, especially under unfavorable conditions, and I am sure the same is true for dragons. That St. George was a courageous fellow! This is just part of a panel depicting St. George slaying the dragon. Because St. George is Ethiopia's patron saint, paintings depicting this story are found in most Ethiopian Christian Orthodox churches. However, this painting is perhaps more significant than others of its kind because of its location in Lalibela's Church of Bet Giorgis, whch is dedicated to St. George. There's a bit more to the story than that, but it will have to wait until I post photos of the church's magnificent and iconic exterior. To my untutored eye, this painting looks quite old. It is less elaborately rendered than the paintings in the churches and monasteries at Lake Tana, which I believe date to the 18th century. I'm not sure what to do with that information. A simpler style could mean the painting is older than the ones at Lake Tana. Conversely, the coarser style could mean the piece was executed after Ethiopian religious art reached its zenith at Lake Tana (a proposition I've more or less made up on the spot). Since this painting is at Lalibela, which predates the churches and monasteries at Lake Tana by centuries, I will speculate this painting is earlier than the 18th century. But, bearing in mind that the Ethiopian empire's fortunes and territorial holdings ebbed and waned frequently over the centuries, with incursions from hostile forces, including Islamic armies, I'm the last person who'd know whether any given painting in a church in Lalibela has been there for 700 years or 70. If any flickerites can offer more information about this painting, including its age and provenance, I'd be grateful. |
Date | |
Source |
The Vanquished Dragon, Church of Bet Giorgis, Lalibela, Ethiopia
|
Author | A. Davey from Where I Live Now: Pacific Northwest |
Licensing
[edit]- You are free:
- to share – to copy, distribute and transmit the work
- to remix – to adapt the work
- Under the following conditions:
- attribution – You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
This image, originally posted to Flickr, was reviewed on 5 October 2012 by the administrator or reviewer File Upload Bot (Magnus Manske), who confirmed that it was available on Flickr under the stated license on that date. |
File history
Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.
Date/Time | Thumbnail | Dimensions | User | Comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
current | 17:50, 5 October 2012 | 3,024 × 1,998 (4.07 MB) | File Upload Bot (Magnus Manske) (talk | contribs) | Transferred from Flickr by User:Elitre |
You cannot overwrite this file.
File usage on Commons
There are no pages that use this file.
Metadata
This file contains additional information such as Exif metadata which may have been added by the digital camera, scanner, or software program used to create or digitize it. If the file has been modified from its original state, some details such as the timestamp may not fully reflect those of the original file. The timestamp is only as accurate as the clock in the camera, and it may be completely wrong.
Camera manufacturer | NIKON CORPORATION |
---|---|
Camera model | NIKON D70 |
Exposure time | 1/45 sec (0.022222222222222) |
F-number | f/1.4 |
ISO speed rating | 1,600 |
Date and time of data generation | 17:01, 1 November 2007 |
Lens focal length | 50 mm |
Pixel composition | RGB |
Orientation | Normal |
Horizontal resolution | 72 dpi |
Vertical resolution | 72 dpi |
Software used | Ver.2.00 |
File change date and time | 17:01, 1 November 2007 |
Exposure Program | Manual |
Date and time of digitizing | 17:01, 1 November 2007 |
APEX exposure bias | 3.5 |
Maximum land aperture | 1 APEX (f/1.41) |
Metering mode | Pattern |
Light source | Daylight fluorescent (D 5700 – 7100K) |
Flash | Flash did not fire |
DateTime subseconds | 80 |
DateTimeOriginal subseconds | 80 |
DateTimeDigitized subseconds | 80 |
Sensing method | One-chip color area sensor |
Custom image processing | Normal process |
Exposure mode | Manual exposure |
White balance | Manual white balance |
Digital zoom ratio | 1 |
Focal length in 35 mm film | 75 mm |
Scene capture type | Standard |
Scene control | Low gain up |
Contrast | Normal |
Saturation | Normal |
Sharpness | Hard |
Subject distance range | Unknown |