File:The Quarterly journal of the Geological Society of London (12733748235).jpg

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Original file(3,200 × 1,945 pixels, file size: 925 KB, MIME type: image/jpeg)

Captions

Captions

Add a one-line explanation of what this file represents

Summary

[edit]
Description

W. TOPLET OK AREAS OF APPARENT UPHEAVAL. 189
these rocks would he affected by this amount, besides that resulting
from the thinning of the higher Secondary rocks themselves.
We see, then, that in estimating the dip of the beds in any such
district, our results will vary according to the rocks which are exposed
in it. But inasmuch as our knowledge of the great movements which
have affected the earth's crust is generally deduced from such obser-
vations, this liability to error becomes a very serious matter.
We infer, for instance, because of what we know of the dip
of the Great Oolite in Gloucestershire and Oxfordshire, that the
beds have been upheaved towards the west and north-west, which
has resulted in a dip to the east and south-east, or towards the
London basin. But if, over this area, denudation had gone much
further than it has done, and all the Oolites down to the higher part
of the Lower Lias had been swept away, w r e should observe that the
beds along this line were approximately flat

and we should infer
that there had been no upheaval here, or that the net results of
such movements as had taken place had been to leave the beds in a
horizontal position. If the whole of the Lias had been denuded, we
should infer a slight westerly dip or from the London basin. If
denudation had gone far into the Trias, sweeping away the whole
of the higher Secondary rocks, we might have inferred a considerable
westerly dip

  • .


3. The Oolitic RocJcs of Yorkshire. — These afford another very
striking example. It is known that the entire Oolitic series, which
is so magnificently developed in the northern part of the county, is
absent under the Wolds, and that the Bed Chalk there rests directly
on the Lower Lias. In part, no doubt, this is due to the great un-
conformity between the Cretaceous and Oolitic rocks

but it is also
partly due to actual thinning of the strata, the Lower Oolites having
disappeared entirely in this manner.
In order to estimate the amount of the dip which is due to this
thinning, we have only to compare the small actual southerly fall
of the bottom of the Inferior Oolite along the base of the western
escarpment with the great southerly dip which the Coral Crag would
have if it now stretched (as once it did) along the top of that escarp-
ment. But this is not all

for the Lias itself is thinning in the same
manner, and we find that the base of the Lias undergoes comparatively
small changes of level along the same north and south line.
4. The Carboniferous Mocks of Yorkshire. — The Carboniferous
Limestone series of Yorkshire has a general dip, from the high land of

Since this paper was read, Mr. Whitaker has kindly drawn my attention f o
the following remarks by Sir W. V. Guise, in his address to the Cotteswold
Naturalists' Field Club, April 10, 1869. Referring to the meeting of the Club
held on March 25, 18GS, Sir W. Guise says

— " Mr. Lucy mentioned bis having
recently made an excursion in the Cotleswolds round Stow and Burford, and
called attention to the gradual thinning out of the beds in a northerly .?.
direction. On the authority of Mr. Hull's Memoirs, to illustrate Map 44,
Geological Survey, he stated that, while at Cleeve Cloud the Inferior Oolite
attains an elevation of 1130 feet, the Cornbrash south of Burford is not much
more than one half that height. This, however, is in some degree due to the
greatly diminished, thickness of the underlying, strata in the latter locality"
Q.'J. G. B. No. 118.

p
Date
Source https://www.flickr.com/photos/biodivlibrary/12733748235
Author Geological Society of London
Full title
InfoField
The Quarterly journal of the Geological Society of London.
Page ID
InfoField
35766078
Item ID
InfoField
110599 (Find related Wikimedia Commons images)
Title ID
InfoField
51125
Page numbers
InfoField
Page 188
BHL Page URL
InfoField
https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/35766078
Page type
InfoField
Illustration
Flickr sets
InfoField
  • The Quarterly journal of the Geological Society of London. v. 30 (1874).
Flickr tags
InfoField
Flickr posted date
InfoField
24 February 2014
Credit
InfoField
This file comes from the Biodiversity Heritage Library.

This tag does not indicate the copyright status of the attached work. A normal copyright tag is still required. See Commons:Licensing.


العربية  বাংলা  Deutsch  English  español  français  italiano  日本語  македонски  Nederlands  polski  +/−



Licensing

[edit]
w:en:Creative Commons
attribution
This file is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 Generic license.
You are free:
  • to share – to copy, distribute and transmit the work
  • to remix – to adapt the work
Under the following conditions:
  • attribution – You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
This image was originally posted to Flickr by BioDivLibrary at https://flickr.com/photos/61021753@N02/12733748235. It was reviewed on 26 August 2015 by FlickreviewR and was confirmed to be licensed under the terms of the cc-by-2.0.

26 August 2015

This image is in the public domain because it is a mere mechanical scan or photocopy of a public domain original, or – from the available evidence – is so similar to such a scan or photocopy that no copyright protection can be expected to arise. The original itself is in the public domain for the following reason:
Public domain

This work is in the public domain in its country of origin and other countries and areas where the copyright term is the author's life plus 70 years or fewer.


This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published (or registered with the U.S. Copyright Office) before January 1, 1929.


This tag is designed for use where there may be a need to assert that any enhancements (eg brightness, contrast, colour-matching, sharpening) are in themselves insufficiently creative to generate a new copyright. It can be used where it is unknown whether any enhancements have been made, as well as when the enhancements are clear but insufficient. For known raw unenhanced scans you can use an appropriate {{PD-old}} tag instead. For usage, see Commons:When to use the PD-scan tag.


Note: This tag applies to scans and photocopies only. For photographs of public domain originals taken from afar, {{PD-Art}} may be applicable. See Commons:When to use the PD-Art tag.

File history

Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.

Date/TimeThumbnailDimensionsUserComment
current20:01, 26 August 2015Thumbnail for version as of 20:01, 26 August 20153,200 × 1,945 (925 KB)FlickreviewR 2 (talk | contribs)Replacing image by its original image from Flickr
19:36, 26 August 2015Thumbnail for version as of 19:36, 26 August 20151,945 × 3,200 (935 KB) (talk | contribs)== {{int:filedesc}} == {{BHL | title = The Quarterly journal of the Geological Society of London. | source = http://www.flickr.com/photos/biodivlibrary/12733748235 | description = W. TOPLET OK AREAS OF APPARENT UPHEAVAL. 189 <br> these rocks...

There are no pages that use this file.