File:The Open court (1897) (14595814077).jpg

Identifier: opencourt11_1897caru (find matches)
Title: The Open court
Year: 1887 (1880s)
Authors: Carus, Paul, 1852-1919
Subjects: Religion
Publisher: Chicago : The Open Court Pub. Co.
Contributing Library: The Newberry Library
Digitizing Sponsor: CARLI: Consortium of Academic and Research Libraries in Illinois

View Book Page: Book Viewer
About This Book: Catalog Entry
View All Images: All Images From Book
Click here to view book online to see this illustration in context in a browseable online version of this book.

Text Appearing Before Image:
ion of Saints, ^y Professor Fiatningo. Illustrated. (September.)The Unrecorded Sayings of Jesus Christ. Thoroughly compiled. (September.) Symposia on Religious and Ethical Subjects. A Controversy on Buddhism. The Rt. Rev. Sltalsii Soyen, Kamakura, Japan, the Rev. Dr. John Henry Bar- ro%vs, Chicago, 111., the Rev. Dr. F. F. Ellinivood, New York City.Is There More Than One Buddhism? By H. Dhariiiapdla.The Cogitations of a Smoking Philosopher. By Canon G. J. Low.A Buddhist Priests View of Relics. By Rev. C. A. Seelakkhandlia. Philosophical and Scientific. Lamarck and Neo-Lamarckianism. By Prof. A. S. Packard. Popular articles by the First Atithorities are constantly appearing on all scientific and philosophicalquestions. Announcements. Ethnological Jurisprudence. By the late Judge On the Philosophy of Science. Prof. Ernst Mach, Post of Bremen. Vienna. On Money. By Count Leo Tolstoi. On General Ideas. Th. Ribot, Paris.Mathematical Recreations, etc. THE OPEN COURT PUBLISHING CO., ,.^^^^^s.
Text Appearing After Image:
LEONHARD EULEK. (1707-1783.) The Open Court. The Open Court A MONTHLY MAGAZINE Devoted to the Science of Religion, the Religion of Science, andthe Extension of the Religious Parliament Idea. VOL. XI. (no. II.) NOVEMBER, 1897. NO. 498 AN INTRODUCTION TO THE STUDY OF ETH-NOLOGICAL JURISPRUDENCE. BY THE LATE JUSTICE ALBERT HERMANN POST. ETHNOLOGICAL JURISPRUDENCE, the most recent branchof the science of law, so richly elaborated by every method ofresearch, has still to battle for its existence. Wide circles in theworld of juridical learning utterly ignore it, or assume a hostileand at best sceptical attitude towards it. Neither the history oflaw nor the philosophy of jurisprudence has accorded it scientificrecognition, and even the tenability of the principles upon whichit is based has been characterised as highly questionable. It is universally true that every new departure in science atfirst meets with opposition, and that it cannot aspire to recogni-tion until it is in a position to p

Note About Images