File:The Law of Dogs in Sectional Title Schemes 06.png
![File:The Law of Dogs in Sectional Title Schemes 06.png](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/5/5c/The_Law_of_Dogs_in_Sectional_Title_Schemes_06.png/800px-The_Law_of_Dogs_in_Sectional_Title_Schemes_06.png?20240717231938)
Original file (1,333 × 750 pixels, file size: 85 KB, MIME type: image/png)
Captions
Captions
Summary
[edit]DescriptionThe Law of Dogs in Sectional Title Schemes 06.png |
English: The Law of Dogs in Sectional Title Schemes (in South Africa):
-PCR 1(1) of the STSM Regulations: “The owner or occupier of a section must not, without the trustees’ written consent, which must not be unreasonably withheld, keep an animal, reptile or bird in a section or on the common property.” -PCR 1(2) of the STSM Regulations: “An owner or occupier suffering from a disability and who reasonably requires a guide, hearing or assistance dog must be considered to have the trustees’ consent to keep that animal in a section and to accompany it on the common property.” -Subsection 39(2)(c) of the CSOS Act: “An order declaring that an animal is being kept in a community scheme contrary to the scheme governance documentation, and requiring the owner or occupier in charge of the animal to remove it…" -The Trustees of The Ridge Body Corporate v Wijne: Adjudication Order Paragraph 47: “The continued conduct [of the Respondents] to keep pets in their unit without authorisation of the Trustees of the Ridge is contrary to the provisions of the scheme’s conduct rules [and] is a violation of the rules and amounts to usurping the authority of the Trustees if not disregarding it…” Adjudication Order Paragraph 50: “In terms of the scheme rules, it is not permissible for an owner or occupier of a unit to keep an animal or pet without prior authorisation of the trustees. In the premises, [the Respondents] are found to have acted in contravention of the scheme rules of The Ridge and have acted contrary to the provisions of Section 39(2)(b) of the Community Schemes Ombud Service Act…” Adjudication Order Paragraph 53.1: “The Respondent … is ordered to remove the pet dog and parrot kept in … The Ridge and out of the scheme within 30 days of delivery of this order.” |
Date | |
Source | Own work |
Author | Law&OrderSUV |
Licensing
[edit]![w:en:Creative Commons](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/7/79/CC_some_rights_reserved.svg/90px-CC_some_rights_reserved.svg.png)
![attribution](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/1/11/Cc-by_new_white.svg/24px-Cc-by_new_white.svg.png)
- You are free:
- to share – to copy, distribute and transmit the work
- to remix – to adapt the work
- Under the following conditions:
- attribution – You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
File history
Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.
Date/Time | Thumbnail | Dimensions | User | Comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
current | 23:19, 17 July 2024 | ![]() | 1,333 × 750 (85 KB) | Law&OrderSUV (talk | contribs) | Uploaded own work with UploadWizard |
You cannot overwrite this file.
File usage on Commons
There are no pages that use this file.
Metadata
This file contains additional information such as Exif metadata which may have been added by the digital camera, scanner, or software program used to create or digitize it. If the file has been modified from its original state, some details such as the timestamp may not fully reflect those of the original file. The timestamp is only as accurate as the clock in the camera, and it may be completely wrong.
Horizontal resolution | 39.37 dpc |
---|---|
Vertical resolution | 39.37 dpc |