File:The Goddess of Jagadhatri at Chandannagar day of nabami IMG 20161109 112445.jpg
Original file (1,440 × 2,560 pixels, file size: 932 KB, MIME type: image/jpeg)
Captions
Summary
[edit]DescriptionThe Goddess of Jagadhatri at Chandannagar day of nabami IMG 20161109 112445.jpg |
English: She is another form of Durga
The festival is especially famous in Chandannagar , former French Chandernagor , as the festival gained in beauty due to French - Bengali collaboration at its' very conception |
Date | |
Source | Own work |
Author | Neline Mondal |
nabami is the big day of the puja , same as asthami is the big day of Durga puja , each festival has a specific date centralised on the puja
Licensing
[edit]- You are free:
- to share – to copy, distribute and transmit the work
- to remix – to adapt the work
- Under the following conditions:
- attribution – You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- share alike – If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same or compatible license as the original.
File history
Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.
Date/Time | Thumbnail | Dimensions | User | Comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
current | 10:39, 23 November 2016 | 1,440 × 2,560 (932 KB) | Neline Mondal (talk | contribs) | User created page with UploadWizard |
You cannot overwrite this file.
File usage on Commons
There are no pages that use this file.
File usage on other wikis
The following other wikis use this file:
- Usage on en.wikipedia.org
- Usage on or.wikipedia.org
- Usage on ta.wikipedia.org
Metadata
This file contains additional information such as Exif metadata which may have been added by the digital camera, scanner, or software program used to create or digitize it. If the file has been modified from its original state, some details such as the timestamp may not fully reflect those of the original file. The timestamp is only as accurate as the clock in the camera, and it may be completely wrong.
Camera model | LS-5009 |
---|---|
Camera manufacturer | LYF |
Lens focal length | 4.6 mm |
Date and time of data generation | 11:24, 9 November 2016 |
ISO speed rating | 201 |
Exposure time | 1/24 sec (0.041666666666667) |
File change date and time | 11:24, 9 November 2016 |
Y and C positioning | Centered |
Vertical resolution | 72 dpi |
Horizontal resolution | 72 dpi |
Color space | sRGB |
Date and time of digitizing | 11:24, 9 November 2016 |
APEX aperture | 2.65 |
Exposure mode | Auto exposure |
DateTimeDigitized subseconds | 613799 |
Focal length in 35 mm film | 0 mm |
Scene capture type | Standard |
Scene type | A directly photographed image |
DateTimeOriginal subseconds | 613799 |
Exposure index | 289 |
Exposure Program | Not defined |
DateTime subseconds | 613799 |
APEX shutter speed | 4.59 |
Metering mode | Center weighted average |
Scene control | High gain up |
Meaning of each component |
|
Flash | Flash did not fire, compulsory flash suppression |
Exif version | 2.2 |
APEX brightness | 1.29 |
Sensing method | 0 |
Supported Flashpix version | 1 |
Direction of image | 0 |
GPS date | 9 November 2016 |
Reference for direction of image | Magnetic direction |
GPS time (atomic clock) | 05:54 |