File:The Famous Five Statute, Parliament Hill, Ottawa, Ontario (29985794291).jpg
Original file (4,000 × 3,000 pixels, file size: 5.03 MB, MIME type: image/jpeg)
Captions
Summary
[edit]DescriptionThe Famous Five Statute, Parliament Hill, Ottawa, Ontario (29985794291).jpg |
The Famous Five, or The Valiant Five, (French: Célèbres cinq) were five prominent Canadian suffragists who advocated for women and children. They asked the Supreme Court of Canada to answer the question, "Does the word 'Persons' in Section 24 of the British North America Act, 1867, include female persons?" in the case Edwards v Canada. The five women, Emily Murphy, Irene Marryat Parlby, Nellie Mooney McClung, Louise Crummy McKinney and Henrietta Muir Edwards, created a petition to ask this question. They fought to have women legally considered persons so that women could be appointed to the Senate. The petition was filed on August 27, 1927, and on April 24, 1928, Canada's Supreme Court summarized its unanimous decision that women are not such "persons". The last line of the judgement reads, "Understood to mean 'Are women eligible for appointment to the Senate of Canada,' the question is answered in the negative." This judgement was overturned by the British Judicial Committee of the Privy Council on October 18, 1929. This case came to be known as the "Persons Case". Although Canadian women (those who were British/Canadian citizens) had the vote in many provinces and in federal elections by 1929, the case was part of a continent-wide drive for political equality, coming seven years after discrimination against women's voting rights was prohibited in the United States through the Nineteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, and thus had important ramifications. Some saw this as "radical change"; others saw it as a restoration of the original framing of the English constitutional documents, including the 1689 Bill of Rights, which uses only the term "person", not the term "man" (or "woman" for that matter). Some others have interpreted the Privy Council rule as causing a change in the Canadian judicial approach to the Canadian constitution, an approach that has come to be known as the "living tree doctrine". <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Famous_Five_" rel="noreferrer nofollow">en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Famous_Five_</a>(Canada) <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Text_of_Creative_Commons_Attribution-ShareAlike_3.0_Unported_License" rel="noreferrer nofollow">en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Text_of_Creative_Commons_...</a> |
Date | |
Source | The Famous Five Statute, Parliament Hill, Ottawa, Ontario |
Author | Ken Lund from Reno, Nevada, USA |
Camera location | 45° 25′ 31.39″ N, 75° 41′ 53.26″ W | View this and other nearby images on: OpenStreetMap | 45.425386; -75.698128 |
---|
Licensing
[edit]- You are free:
- to share – to copy, distribute and transmit the work
- to remix – to adapt the work
- Under the following conditions:
- attribution – You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- share alike – If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same or compatible license as the original.
This image was originally posted to Flickr by Ken Lund at https://flickr.com/photos/75683070@N00/29985794291. It was reviewed on 10 March 2022 by FlickreviewR 2 and was confirmed to be licensed under the terms of the cc-by-sa-2.0. |
10 March 2022
File history
Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.
Date/Time | Thumbnail | Dimensions | User | Comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
current | 15:45, 10 March 2022 | 4,000 × 3,000 (5.03 MB) | Mindmatrix (talk | contribs) | Transferred from Flickr via #flickr2commons |
You cannot overwrite this file.
File usage on Commons
There are no pages that use this file.
Metadata
This file contains additional information such as Exif metadata which may have been added by the digital camera, scanner, or software program used to create or digitize it. If the file has been modified from its original state, some details such as the timestamp may not fully reflect those of the original file. The timestamp is only as accurate as the clock in the camera, and it may be completely wrong.
Camera manufacturer | Canon |
---|---|
Camera model | Canon PowerShot SX280 HS |
Exposure time | 1/640 sec (0.0015625) |
F-number | f/4 |
ISO speed rating | 80 |
Date and time of data generation | 11:53, 29 September 2016 |
Lens focal length | 4.5 mm |
Latitude | 45° 25′ 31.39″ N |
Longitude | 75° 41′ 53.26″ W |
Altitude | 98 meters above sea level |
Orientation | Normal |
Horizontal resolution | 180 dpi |
Vertical resolution | 180 dpi |
File change date and time | 11:53, 29 September 2016 |
Y and C positioning | Co-sited |
Exif version | 2.3 |
Date and time of digitizing | 11:53, 29 September 2016 |
Meaning of each component |
|
Image compression mode | 3 |
APEX shutter speed | 9.3125 |
APEX aperture | 4 |
APEX exposure bias | −0.33333333333333 |
Maximum land aperture | 3.625 APEX (f/3.51) |
Metering mode | Pattern |
Flash | Flash did not fire, compulsory flash suppression |
Supported Flashpix version | 1 |
Color space | sRGB |
Focal plane X resolution | 16,393.442622951 |
Focal plane Y resolution | 16,393.442622951 |
Focal plane resolution unit | inches |
Sensing method | One-chip color area sensor |
File source | Digital still camera |
Custom image processing | Custom process |
Exposure mode | Manual exposure |
White balance | Auto white balance |
Digital zoom ratio | 1 |
Scene capture type | Standard |
GPS time (atomic clock) | 18:53 |
Receiver status | Measurement in progress |
Geodetic survey data used | WGS-84 |
GPS date | 29 September 2016 |
GPS tag version | 0.0.3.2 |
Rating (out of 5) | 0 |