File:The British journal of dermatology (1888) (14769450605).jpg

Identifier: britishjournalof35brit (find matches)
Title: The British journal of dermatology
Year: 1888 (1880s)
Authors: British Association of Dermatology
Subjects: Dermatology Syphilis
Publisher: London H.K. Lewis (etc.)
Contributing Library: Gerstein - University of Toronto
Digitizing Sponsor: University of Toronto

View Book Page: Book Viewer
About This Book: Catalog Entry
View All Images: All Images From Book
Click here to view book online to see this illustration in context in a browseable online version of this book.

Text Appearing Before Image:
sed typical neurodermatitis of a years duration.Considering the intractability of this affection and the lack of response even toX-rays in some cases, this addition to the therapeutic ai-mamentarium wouldbe valuable. H. S. A LICHEN PLANUS ERUPTION AFTER ARSPHENAMIN. Lawrence K. McCafferty. (Arch, of Derm, and Syjih., 1922. vi, p. 591.)In the case here reported, a mulatto woman, suffering from syphilis, developedafter nine intravenous injections of arsphenamin a lichenoid eruption on thetrunk and arms.whicb closely simulated, both clinically and histologically, lichenplanus. The eruption was associated with symptoms of arsenical poisoning,and on this account it was believed that the arsphenamin was the cause of it. andthat it was not a coincidence. Cases of arsenical dermatitis assimilating lichenplanus have been described previously, but in no case reported has theappearance been so similar to that disease. J. M. H. M. y British Journal of Dermatology and Syphilis.) (Vol. XXXV, No. 2,
Text Appearing After Image:
Dr. J. J. Pkingle. y THE BRITISH JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY AND SYPHILIS FEBRUARY, 1923. OBITUARY. JOHN JAMES PEINGLE, M.B., C.M.Epin., F.E.C.P.Lond., Consulting Physician, Skin-Department, Middlesex Hospital. By the death of Dr. J. J. Pringle Dermatology suffers a very greatloss. During nearly forty years he worked devotedly for the advance-ment of the knowledge of diseases of the skin, and particularly inthe cause of British Dermatology. Although he wrote no text-bookand contributed comparatively little to the literature of skin-diseases,he was well known and highly regarded for his learning and skill,not only in this country but on the continent and in America. He was ever alive to all that was new in work or ideas in the dermato-logical world, and helped by his ardour and encoui-agement to stimulatethe interest of others. Seveial of his former pupils now in chargeof dermatological departments in teaching hospitals in London owemuch to his impellent and kindly influence as well as to h

Note About Images