File:Thái Bình Thông Bảo - Dr. Luke Roberts 03.jpg
Thái_Bình_Thông_Bảo_-_Dr._Luke_Roberts_03.jpg (150 × 149 pixels, file size: 34 KB, MIME type: image/jpeg)
Captions
Summary
[edit]DescriptionThái Bình Thông Bảo - Dr. Luke Roberts 03.jpg |
English: Thai Binh Thong Bao, reverse "ichi so"
This coin was minted from 1737, more or less at the same time as the Canh Hung Thong Bao below. This coin has markings on the back which are not exactly like what I can find in the catalogues, but coins are filled with variety in this era in Vietnam. On the back of this coin at the top is the character for "one" and on the bottom an arrow shape not too unlike the recognized variety (in Japanese: hai so) of a left dot over a diagonal line. Maybe this is that type. 23.5 mm x 1 mm 太平通宝 背一ソ (フ?) |
Date | |
Source | Vietnam (Annam) Cash Coins (University of California at Santa Barbara). |
Author | Dr. Luke Shepherd Roberts |
Licensing
[edit]This file comes from the collection of Dr. Luke Shepherd Roberts and is copyrighted.
Note: This permission only extends to the texts and photos of coins which are in the public domain at this link and its subpages, with the exception of the page The Manufacture of Cash Coins. It does not include any other content from www.history.ucsb.edu.
|
File history
Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.
Date/Time | Thumbnail | Dimensions | User | Comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
current | 10:29, 20 May 2018 | 150 × 149 (34 KB) | Donald Trung (talk | contribs) | User created page with UploadWizard |
You cannot overwrite this file.
File usage on Commons
There are no pages that use this file.
Metadata
This file contains additional information such as Exif metadata which may have been added by the digital camera, scanner, or software program used to create or digitize it. If the file has been modified from its original state, some details such as the timestamp may not fully reflect those of the original file. The timestamp is only as accurate as the clock in the camera, and it may be completely wrong.
Rating (out of 5) | 4 |
---|