File:Squaw Valley skating rink.jpg

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Original file (500 × 666 pixels, file size: 279 KB, MIME type: image/jpeg)

Captions

Captions

Add a one-line explanation of what this file represents

Summary

[edit]
Description

Squaw Valley #19. This is a blurb I posted with a different photo in November. Since I have a lot of new contacts I decided to repost...

Flickr has made me observe a very interesting issue of SCALE in art. Does a piece of art look the same in one physical scale versus another? In Flickr, an image better look good in thumbnail if it's going to get attention. Certain elements do well in thumbnail: humans, repeating geometry, landscapes, bold colors, flowers, bokeh. Pictures dominated by detail and/or subtlety, on the other hand, really only look good when viewed larger, and thus suffer in popularity.

As McLuhan said, "the medium makes the message". As the visual arts went from the physical to the electronic, it enabled scale. I wonder whether we really think of our images very much in terms of this complex issue of scale of view. In this paradigm, is an image that only looks good in one scale a lesser-quality image than one which, all things being equal, looks good in multiple scales?

Practically, on Flickr, I believe that while the quality of a larger version of an image is what generates faves and "custom" comments, it's the quality of the thumbnail in large part that determines views and "award" comments.

(Explore 3.7.2008--Thanks friends!)
Date
Source

The scaling issue in digital art

Author Kevin Dooley from Chander, AZ, USA
Camera location39° 11′ 47.73″ N, 120° 13′ 40.88″ W Kartographer map based on OpenStreetMap.View this and other nearby images on: OpenStreetMapinfo

Licensing

[edit]
w:en:Creative Commons
attribution
This file is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 Generic license.
You are free:
  • to share – to copy, distribute and transmit the work
  • to remix – to adapt the work
Under the following conditions:
  • attribution – You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
This image, originally posted to Flickr, was reviewed on December 18, 2011 by the administrator or reviewer File Upload Bot (Magnus Manske), who confirmed that it was available on Flickr under the stated license on that date.

File history

Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.

Date/TimeThumbnailDimensionsUserComment
current09:29, 18 December 2011Thumbnail for version as of 09:29, 18 December 2011500 × 666 (279 KB)File Upload Bot (Magnus Manske) (talk | contribs){{Information |Description=Squaw Valley #19. This is a blurb I posted with a different photo in November. Since I have a lot of new contacts I decided to repost... Flickr has made me observe a very interesting issue of SCALE in art. Does a piece of ar

There are no pages that use this file.

Metadata