File:Southern Ring Nebula (NIRCam and MIRI Images Side by Side) (weic2207a).jpeg
![File:Southern Ring Nebula (NIRCam and MIRI Images Side by Side) (weic2207a).jpeg](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/0/00/Southern_Ring_Nebula_%28NIRCam_and_MIRI_Images_Side_by_Side%29_%28weic2207a%29.jpeg/800px-Southern_Ring_Nebula_%28NIRCam_and_MIRI_Images_Side_by_Side%29_%28weic2207a%29.jpeg?20221114002807)
Original file (9,284 × 4,310 pixels, file size: 4.13 MB, MIME type: image/jpeg)
Captions
Captions
Summary
[edit]DescriptionSouthern Ring Nebula (NIRCam and MIRI Images Side by Side) (weic2207a).jpeg |
English: This side-by-side comparison shows observations of the Southern Ring Nebula in near-infrared light, at left, and mid-infrared light, at right, from the NASA/ESA/CSA Webb Telescope.This scene was created by a white dwarf star — the remnant of a star like our Sun after it shed its outer layers and stopped burning fuel through nuclear fusion. Those outer layers now form the ejected shells seen in this view.In the Near-Infrared Camera (NIRCam) image, the white dwarf appears to the lower left of the bright, central star, partially hidden by a diffraction spike. The same star appears — but brighter, larger, and redder — in the Mid-Infrared Instrument (MIRI) image. This white dwarf star is cloaked in thick layers of dust, which make it appear larger.The brighter star in both images hasn’t yet shed its layers. It closely orbits the dimmer white dwarf, helping to distribute what it’s ejected.Over thousands of years and before it became a white dwarf, the star periodically ejected mass — the visible shells of material. As if on repeat, it contracted, heated up, and then, unable to push out more material, pulsated. Stellar material was sent in all directions — like a rotating sprinkler — and provided the ingredients for this asymmetrical landscape.Today, the white dwarf is heating up the gas in the inner regions — which appear blue in the left-hand image and red in the right-hand image. Both stars are lighting up the outer regions, shown in orange and blue, respectively.The images look very different because NIRCam and MIRI collect different wavelengths of light. NIRCam observes near-infrared light, which is closer to the visible wavelengths our eyes detect. MIRI goes farther into the infrared, picking up mid-infrared wavelengths. The second star appears more clearly in the MIRI image, because this instrument can see the gleaming dust around it, bringing it more clearly into view.The stars — and their layers of light — steal more attention in the NIRCam image, while dust plays the lead in the MIRI image, specifically dust that is illuminated.Peer at the circular region at the centre of each image. Each contains a wobbly, asymmetrical belt of material. This is where the two ‘bowls’ that make up the nebula meet. (In this view, the nebula is at a 40-degree angle.) This belt is easier to spot in the MIRI image — look for the yellowish circle — but is also visible in the NIRCam image.The light that travels through the orange dust in the NIRCam image — which look like spotlights — disappears at longer infrared wavelengths in the MIRI image.In near-infrared light, stars have more prominent diffraction spikes because they are so bright at these wavelengths. In mid-infrared light, diffraction spikes also appear around stars, but they are fainter and smaller (zoom in to spot them).Physics explains the difference in the resolution of these images. NIRCam delivers high-resolution imaging because these wavelengths of light are shorter. MIRI supplies medium-resolution imagery because its wavelengths are longer; the longer the wavelength, the coarser the images are. But both deliver an incredible amount of detail about every object they observe — providing never-before-seen vistas of the universe.For a full array of Webb’s first images and spectra, including downloadable files, please visit: https://esawebb.org/initiatives/webbs-first-images/ |
Date | 12 July 2022, 16:58 (upload date) |
Source | Southern Ring Nebula (NIRCam and MIRI Images Side by Side) |
Author | NASA, ESA, CSA, STScI, and the Webb ERO Production Team |
Other versions |
|
Licensing
[edit]![]() ![]() |
ESA/Webb images, videos and web texts are released by the ESA under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license and may on a non-exclusive basis be reproduced without fee provided they are clearly and visibly credited. Detailed conditions are below; see the ESA copyright statement for full information. For images created by NASA or on the webbtelescope.org website, use the {{PD-Webb}} tag.
Conditions:
Notes:
|
![]() |
![w:en:Creative Commons](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/7/79/CC_some_rights_reserved.svg/90px-CC_some_rights_reserved.svg.png)
![attribution](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/1/11/Cc-by_new_white.svg/24px-Cc-by_new_white.svg.png)
- You are free:
- to share – to copy, distribute and transmit the work
- to remix – to adapt the work
- Under the following conditions:
- attribution – You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
File history
Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.
Date/Time | Thumbnail | Dimensions | User | Comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
current | 00:28, 14 November 2022 | ![]() | 9,284 × 4,310 (4.13 MB) | OptimusPrimeBot (talk | contribs) | #Spacemedia - Upload of https://cdn.esawebb.org/archives/images/large/weic2207a.jpg via Commons:Spacemedia |
You cannot overwrite this file.
File usage on Commons
The following 2 pages use this file:
Metadata
This file contains additional information such as Exif metadata which may have been added by the digital camera, scanner, or software program used to create or digitize it. If the file has been modified from its original state, some details such as the timestamp may not fully reflect those of the original file. The timestamp is only as accurate as the clock in the camera, and it may be completely wrong.
Source | STScI |
---|---|
Credit/Provider | NASA, ESA, CSA, STScI, and The ERO Production Team |
Copyright holder |
|
Author | Space Telescope Science Institute Office of Public Outreach |
Short title |
|
Image title |
|
Usage terms | |
Date and time of data generation | 11:00, 12 July 2022 |
JPEG file comment | This side-by-side comparison shows observations of the Southern Ring Nebula in near-infrared light, at left, and mid-infrared light, at right, from NASA’s Webb Telescope.
This scene was created by a white dwarf star – the remains of a star like our Sun after it shed its outer layers and stopped burning fuel though nuclear fusion. Those outer layers now form the ejected shells all along this view. In the Near-Infrared Camera (NIRCam) image, the white dwarf appears to the lower left of the bright, central star, partially hidden by a diffraction spike. The same star appears – but brighter, larger, and redder – in the Mid-Infrared Instrument (MIRI) image. This white dwarf star is cloaked in thick layers of dust, which make it appear larger. The brighter star in both images hasn’t yet shed its layers. It closely orbits the dimmer white dwarf, helping to distribute what it’s ejected. Over thousands of years and before it became a white dwarf, the star periodically ejected mass – the visible shells of material. As if on repeat, it contracted, heated up – and then, unable to push out more material, pulsated. Stellar material was sent in all directions – like a rotating sprinkler – and provided the ingredients for this asymmetrical landscape. Today, the white dwarf is heating up the gas in the inner regions – which appear blue at left and red at right. Both stars are lighting up the outer regions, shown in orange and blue, respectively. The images look very different because NIRCam and MIRI collect different wavelengths of light. NIRCam observes near-infrared light, which is closer to the visible wavelengths our eyes detect. MIRI goes farther into the infrared, picking up mid-infrared wavelengths. The second star more clearly appears in the MIRI image, because this instrument can see the gleaming dust around it, bringing it more clearly into view. The stars – and their layers of light – steal more attention in the NIRCam image, while dust plays the lead in the MIRI image, specifically dust that is illuminated. Peer at the circular region at the center of both images. Each contains a wobbly, asymmetrical belt of material. This is where two “bowls” that make up the nebula meet. (In this view, the nebula is at a 40-degree angle.) This belt is easier to spot in the MIRI image – look for the yellowish circle – but is also visible in the NIRCam image. The light that travels through the orange dust in the NIRCam image – which look like spotlights – disappear at longer infrared wavelengths in the MIRI image. In near-infrared light, stars have more prominent diffraction spikes because they are so bright at these wavelengths. In mid-infrared light, diffraction spikes also appear around stars, but they are fainter and smaller (zoom in to spot them). Physics is the reason for the difference in the resolution of these images. NIRCam delivers high-resolution imaging because these wavelengths of light are shorter. MIRI supplies medium-resolution imagery because its wavelengths are longer – the longer the wavelength, the coarser the images are. But both deliver an incredible amount of detail about every object they observe – providing never-before-seen vistas of the universe. For a full array of Webb’s first images and spectra, including downloadable files, please visit: https://webbtelescope.org/news/first-images NIRCam was built by a team at the University of Arizona and Lockheed Martin’s Advanced Technology Center. MIRI was contributed by ESA and NASA, with the instrument designed and built by a consortium of nationally funded European Institutes (The MIRI European Consortium) in partnership with JPL and the University of Arizona. |
Color space | sRGB |
Software used | Adobe Photoshop 23.3 (Macintosh) |
Date and time of digitizing | 05:26, 6 December 2021 |
Date metadata was last modified | 10:55, 2 July 2022 |
File change date and time | 10:38, 2 July 2022 |
Unique ID of original document | xmp.did:ac8b8199-a5b9-4669-a311-a24c750d0882 |
Copyright status | Copyright status not set |
Keywords |
|
Contact information | outreach@stsci.edu
3700 San Martin Drive Baltimore, MD, 21218 USA |