File:Shimasen - Dr. Luke Roberts 06.jpg
Shimasen_-_Dr._Luke_Roberts_06.jpg (150 × 151 pixels, file size: 33 KB, MIME type: image/jpeg)
Captions
Captions
Summary
[edit]DescriptionShimasen - Dr. Luke Roberts 06.jpg |
English: This Kan'ei Tsuuhou is based on the bunsen type of Japanese coin first minted in 1668. However, the 'Bun' character on the back is behind the Tsuu character on the right, rather than behind the Kan which is the way in the original. It is as if the reverse had been rotated 90 degrees clockwise. This thought is interesting because even the center squares of the front and back are not well aligned, and there may have been something in the manufacturing process of the mother coin which produced this anomaly.
24.5mm x 1.5 mm 寛永通宝 背横文 島銭 |
Date | |
Source | Indonesian "Naive" Copies: Shimasen (University of California at Santa Barbara). |
Author | Dr. Luke Shepherd Roberts |
Licensing
[edit]This file comes from the collection of Dr. Luke Shepherd Roberts and is copyrighted.
Note: This permission only extends to the texts and photos of coins which are in the public domain at this link and its subpages, with the exception of the page The Manufacture of Cash Coins. It does not include any other content from www.history.ucsb.edu.
|
File history
Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.
Date/Time | Thumbnail | Dimensions | User | Comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
current | 11:19, 18 May 2018 | ![]() | 150 × 151 (33 KB) | Donald Trung (talk | contribs) | User created page with UploadWizard |
You cannot overwrite this file.
File usage on Commons
There are no pages that use this file.
Metadata
This file contains additional information such as Exif metadata which may have been added by the digital camera, scanner, or software program used to create or digitize it. If the file has been modified from its original state, some details such as the timestamp may not fully reflect those of the original file. The timestamp is only as accurate as the clock in the camera, and it may be completely wrong.
Rating (out of 5) | 4 |
---|