File:R-SR Pier Seismic Reconstruction Compared.png
Original file (1,288 × 926 pixels, file size: 2.36 MB, MIME type: image/png)
Captions
Summary
[edit]DescriptionR-SR Pier Seismic Reconstruction Compared.png |
English: Comparison of Richmond-San Rafael Bridge piers before and after reconstruction for seismic concerns.
Top photo was taken in 2003 and shows the eastern cantilever span. Pier bracing is "chevron-style" and diagonal braces come to a common central point. Bottom photo was taken in 2011 after reconstruction was complete and shows the western cantilever span. Note difference in vertical clearance between western span (180 ft) and eastern span (135 ft) which is reflected in the height of the supporting piers. Reconstructed pier bracing is "eccentric" and diagonal braces no longer come to a common central point. |
Date | |
Source | Own work, cropped from existing photographs on Commons as noted below. |
Author | Mliu92 |
Other versions |
This file was derived from: |
Licensing
[edit]- You are free:
- to share – to copy, distribute and transmit the work
- to remix – to adapt the work
- Under the following conditions:
- attribution – You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- share alike – If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same or compatible license as the original.
File history
Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.
Date/Time | Thumbnail | Dimensions | User | Comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
current | 16:01, 3 March 2016 | 1,288 × 926 (2.36 MB) | Mliu92 (talk | contribs) | User created page with UploadWizard |
You cannot overwrite this file.
File usage on Commons
There are no pages that use this file.
File usage on other wikis
The following other wikis use this file:
- Usage on en.wikipedia.org
Metadata
This file contains additional information such as Exif metadata which may have been added by the digital camera, scanner, or software program used to create or digitize it. If the file has been modified from its original state, some details such as the timestamp may not fully reflect those of the original file. The timestamp is only as accurate as the clock in the camera, and it may be completely wrong.
PNG file comment |
|
---|---|
Horizontal resolution | 28.35 dpc |
Vertical resolution | 28.35 dpc |
File change date and time | 15:58, 3 March 2016 |