File:Punch (1841) (14596260837).jpg

Identifier: punchv50lemo (find matches)
Title: Punch
Year: 1841 (1840s)
Authors: Lemon, Mark, 1809-1870 Mayhew, Henry, 1812-1887 Taylor, Tom, 1817-1880 Brooks, Shirley, 1816-1874 Burnand, F. C. (Francis Cowley), 1836-1917 Seaman, Owen, 1861-1936
Subjects: English wit and humor English wit and humor, Pictorial
Publisher: (London) : (Punch Publications Ltd., etc.)
Contributing Library: Lincoln Financial Foundation Collection
Digitizing Sponsor: The Institute of Museum and Library Services through an Indiana State Library LSTA Grant

View Book Page: Book Viewer
About This Book: Catalog Entry
View All Images: All Images From Book
Click here to view book online to see this illustration in context in a browseable online version of this book.

Text Appearing Before Image:
He would probably have taken the Oaths And his Seat Tlien, what would have become of Hijv A Handy Excuse. A Most elegant lady was taken up for kleptomania, when a gentle-man present said, It was all owing to her taper hand. And pray,what has that to do with it P inquired the unsuspecting Magistrate.Why, Sir, you see it accounts naturally for her being light-fingered. Ornithology. The Dodo is not extinct. This birds name, when written in full, isknown to all Ornithologists as the Ditto-ditto; epistolary necessitieshave reduced the title to Do-do. Yours truly, A. V. Airy. I - February 17, 1866.) PUNCH, OR THE LONDON CHARIVARI. 65
Text Appearing After Image:
BAD CUSTOMER. Landlady. What Gentlemans Luggage is this, Sam? Ancient Waiter. Getlemans Luggage, m ! Or bleshyer, no, Mum! Thats artiss traps, that is. Theyllave Tea hereto-night, take a little lodgin* to-morrow, and there theyll be a loafin about the place for months, doin no good toNobody ! SUBURBS OF EASE. According to the South London Chronicle, two distinct projects, tobe worked out by as many joint-stock companies (limited), are on. footin philanthropic and commercial circles, with a view to the creation, inthe neighbourhood of London, of suburban villages. That is to say,one of these projects is contemplated in a philanthropic circle; theother in a commercial circle. The former, aiming to provide suitablehouses for the working-classes, relies on the principle that a gift to thepoor is a loan on the safest possible security; the latter, intendingsimply to make money, is based on the assumption that capitalistsmay obtain good dividends. These two projects, both the one designed b

Note About Images