File:Prevalence of super- and sub-claims by climate misinfo communicators statistics.webp
From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
![File:Prevalence of super- and sub-claims by climate misinfo communicators statistics.webp](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/b/bc/Prevalence_of_super-_and_sub-claims_by_climate_misinfo_communicators_statistics.webp/800px-Prevalence_of_super-_and_sub-claims_by_climate_misinfo_communicators_statistics.webp.png?20230614223256)
Size of this PNG preview of this WEBP file: 800 × 437 pixels. Other resolutions: 320 × 175 pixels | 640 × 349 pixels | 1,024 × 559 pixels | 1,280 × 699 pixels | 2,006 × 1,095 pixels.
Original file (2,006 × 1,095 pixels, file size: 161 KB, MIME type: image/webp)
File information
Structured data
Captions
Captions
From the study "Computer-assisted classification of contrarian claims about climate change"
Summary
[edit]DescriptionPrevalence of super- and sub-claims by climate misinfo communicators statistics.webp |
English: "(a) illustrates the share of claim-making paragraphs related to the sub-claims of our taxonomy by CTTs (circle) and blogs (hollow square). (b) and (c) Display the share of 515,005 claim-making paragraphs devoted to the following super-claim categories: 1. Global warming is not happening (green hollow circle), 2. Humans are not causing global warming (yellow diamond), 3. Climate impacts are not bad (blue filled square), 4. Climate solutions won’t work (black circle), and 5. Climate movement/science is unreliable (orange hollow square). Note that estimates prior to 2007 in (c) are derived from a relatively small number of blogs."
"Figure 2 provides the prevalence of the five key climate disbeliefs for CTTs (Fig 2b) and blogs (Fig 2c) over time, while also providing the distribution of claim prevalence across relevant sub-claims (Fig 2a). The figure offers insights into the key similarities and differences in claims across contrarian blogs and CTTs, as well as the evolution of claims over time. In general, CTTs focus predominantly on the shortcomings of climate solutions (category 4) and attacks on climate science and scientists (category 5). While the initial years of the series were marked with approximately equal levels of emphasis on these two categories, category 4 gained prominence following 2008. This shift in the focus of the (mainly US-based) CTTs coincides with the transition of power from Republican to Democratic hands and the corresponding threat of climate legislation: in 2007, for the first time since 1993, the Democrats obtained a majority in both congressional chambers and in 2008 Senator Obama, consistently leading the presidential election opinion polls, promised comprehensive climate legislation in his presidential campaign. However, category 4 claims have dominated the CTT discourse for the remainder of the sample period, indicating a more permanent shift towards attacks on climate solutions. Blogs, on the other hand, have consistently devoted the largest share of their claims to attacking climate science and scientists. Yet, even for blogs, discussion of climate policy has risen over the last decade while challenges to the reliability of climate science and the climate movement have been on a downward trend, indicating that future contrarian claims are likely to increasingly focus on climate solutions." |
Date | |
Source | https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-021-01714-4 |
Author | Authors of the study: Travis G. Coan, Constantine Boussalis, John Cook & Mirjam O. Nanko |
Licensing
[edit]![w:en:Creative Commons](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/7/79/CC_some_rights_reserved.svg/90px-CC_some_rights_reserved.svg.png)
![attribution](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/1/11/Cc-by_new_white.svg/24px-Cc-by_new_white.svg.png)
This file is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.
- You are free:
- to share – to copy, distribute and transmit the work
- to remix – to adapt the work
- Under the following conditions:
- attribution – You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
File history
Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.
Date/Time | Thumbnail | Dimensions | User | Comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
current | 22:32, 14 June 2023 | ![]() | 2,006 × 1,095 (161 KB) | Prototyperspective (talk | contribs) | Uploaded a work by Authors of the study: Travis G. Coan, Constantine Boussalis, John Cook & Mirjam O. Nanko from https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-021-01714-4 with UploadWizard |
You cannot overwrite this file.
File usage on Commons
There are no pages that use this file.