File:Monocot vs dicot Pengo.jpg
Original file (963 × 759 pixels, file size: 336 KB, MIME type: image/jpeg)
Captions
- Description
- Comparison of monocot and dicot sprouting
Summary
[edit]DescriptionMonocot vs dicot Pengo.jpg | Comparison of monocot and dicot sprouting |
Date | |
Source |
This file is lacking source information.
Please edit this file's description and provide a source. |
Author | w:User:Pengo |
Other versions |
Licensing
[edit]Photo credit: Peter Halasz. (User:Pengo)
- You are free:
- to share – to copy, distribute and transmit the work
- to remix – to adapt the work
- Under the following conditions:
- attribution – You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- share alike – If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same or compatible license as the original.
Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation; with no Invariant Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts. A copy of the license is included in the section entitled GNU Free Documentation License.http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/fdl.htmlGFDLGNU Free Documentation Licensetruetrue |
This file is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported license. | ||
| ||
This licensing tag was added to this file as part of the GFDL licensing update.http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/CC BY-SA 3.0Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0truetrue |
For Creative Commons and GFDL licenses, give attribution to:
- Peter Halasz
- and/or, link to this image page:
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Monocot_vs_dicot_Pengo.jpg
Although not a requirement of the licenses, if you use this image in print or media other than the web, I would appreciate it if you let me know. Please contact me if you require alternate licensing.
This image is very small, unfixably too light/dark, or may not adequately illustrate the subject of the image If a higher-quality version of this particular image is available, please replace this one; otherwise, a supplemental image illustrating this subject and available under a free license should be found or provided and uploaded as a separate file.
Please see Category:Image cleanup templates for templates used to mark images that only need a clean-up. For more help, see Commons:Media for cleanup#Low quality images. العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文(简体) ∙ 中文(繁體) ∙ 中文(臺灣) ∙ +/− |
File history
Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.
Date/Time | Thumbnail | Dimensions | User | Comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
current | 02:07, 4 June 2006 | 963 × 759 (336 KB) | Pengo (talk | contribs) | == Summary == {{Information |Description=Comparison of monocot and dicot sprouting |Source= |Date=2006-06-04 |Author=Peter Chrome |Permission= |other_versions=Image:Monocot_vs_dicot_crop_Pengo.jpg (middle cut out) }} [[Category: |
You cannot overwrite this file.
File usage on Commons
The following page uses this file:
File usage on other wikis
The following other wikis use this file:
- Usage on de.wiktionary.org
- Usage on ms.wikipedia.org
- Usage on ms.wiktionary.org
- Usage on to.wikipedia.org
Metadata
This file contains additional information such as Exif metadata which may have been added by the digital camera, scanner, or software program used to create or digitize it. If the file has been modified from its original state, some details such as the timestamp may not fully reflect those of the original file. The timestamp is only as accurate as the clock in the camera, and it may be completely wrong.
Camera manufacturer | Panasonic |
---|---|
Camera model | DMC-FZ5 |
Exposure time | 1/100 sec (0.01) |
F-number | f/4 |
ISO speed rating | 80 |
Date and time of data generation | 11:47, 4 June 2006 |
Lens focal length | 6 mm |
Orientation | Normal |
Horizontal resolution | 72 dpi |
Vertical resolution | 72 dpi |
Software used | Ver.1.0 |
File change date and time | 11:47, 4 June 2006 |
Y and C positioning | Co-sited |
Exposure Program | Normal program |
Exif version | 2.2 |
Date and time of digitizing | 11:47, 4 June 2006 |
Image compression mode | 4 |
APEX exposure bias | 0 |
Maximum land aperture | 3 APEX (f/2.83) |
Metering mode | Pattern |
Light source | Unknown |
Flash | Flash did not fire, compulsory flash suppression |
Color space | sRGB |
Sensing method | One-chip color area sensor |
Custom image processing | Normal process |
Exposure mode | Auto exposure |
White balance | Auto white balance |
Digital zoom ratio | 0 |
Focal length in 35 mm film | 36 mm |
Scene capture type | Standard |
Contrast | Normal |
Saturation | Normal |
Sharpness | Normal |