File:Messier 100.png

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Original file (4,060 × 4,089 pixels, file size: 29.36 MB, MIME type: image/png)

Captions

Captions

Add a one-line explanation of what this file represents
Description

Yes, I <a href="https://www.flickr.com/photos/geckzilla/8465634839/">already did this</a> one, but I was looking at it and decided I could be less sloppy about filling in the (evil) chip gap. Also, I think I went a little nuts with the saturation and ended up making it a kind of fantasy blue. The truth is that this galaxy is not really all that colorful, especially if you are looking at just the core of it like Hubble does. Note that I did bump up the saturation just a tad. If you know where to look, you'll also see <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SN_2006X" rel="nofollow">supernova 2006X</a>.

Edit: Previously I said the supernova was the bright star. Actually, all that was left <a href="http://archive.stsci.edu/proposal_search.php?mission=hst&id=11646" rel="nofollow">at the time of imaging</a> was a <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=geAjufAYAow" rel="nofollow">light echo</a> illuminating the surrounding dust. I went ahead and marked it with a note.

Previously I had been baffled by the data I found to fill in the chip gap. I guess I was in a rush because I didn't bother doing a <a href="http://hubblesite.org/newscenter/archive/releases/1994/01/" rel="nofollow">little research</a> to understand what it was I was using. As it turns out, I had found what could be called an antique by Hubble standards. Before the first servicing mission to install the WFPC2 they <a href="http://archive.stsci.edu/proposal_search.php?id=5184&mission=hst" rel="nofollow">decided</a> to take a picture of M100 with the WFPC1, which you probably already know had problems which made a lot of people very sad and disappointed for a while even though it was still better than the best ground telescopes at the time. Admittedly, the WFPC1 data really is depressingly bad compared to even WFPC2. And if you put it next to WFC3 data, it looks like a child's crayon drawing next to a classical painting. But it's still better than a blank gap!

Red: hst_11646_01_wfc3_uvis_f775w_sci Green: hst_11646_01_wfc3_uvis_f555w_sci Blue: hst_11646_01_wfc3_uvis_f475w_sci

Chip gap: Red: hst_05195_01_wfpc2_f702w_wf_sci + WFPC1 F702W data Green: hst_05195_01_wfpc2_f555w_wf_sci + WFPC1 F555W data Blue: hst_05195_01_wfpc2_f439w_wf_sci + WFPC1 F439W data

North is almost up. It is 7.4° counter-clockwise from up.
Date
Source Flickr: M100
Author Judy Schmidt
Permission
(Reusing this file)
This image, which was originally posted to Flickr, was uploaded to Commons using Flickr upload bot on 18 February 2014, 21:31 by Fabian RRRR. On that date, it was confirmed to be licensed under the terms of the license indicated.
w:en:Creative Commons
attribution
This file is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 Generic license.
You are free:
  • to share – to copy, distribute and transmit the work
  • to remix – to adapt the work
Under the following conditions:
  • attribution – You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.

File history

Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.

Date/TimeThumbnailDimensionsUserComment
current21:31, 18 February 2014Thumbnail for version as of 21:31, 18 February 20144,060 × 4,089 (29.36 MB)Flickr upload bot (talk | contribs)Uploaded from http://flickr.com/photo/54209675@N00/11694604174 using Flickr upload bot

There are no pages that use this file.

File usage on other wikis

The following other wikis use this file:

Metadata