File:Messerschmitt Me262A-1a Schwalbe (50111729907).jpg
Original file (6,000 × 4,000 pixels, file size: 6.66 MB, MIME type: image/jpeg)
Captions
Summary
[edit]DescriptionMesserschmitt Me262A-1a Schwalbe (50111729907).jpg |
Messerschmitt Me262A-1a Schwalbe (Swallow) at the RAF Museum, Cosford, Shropshire, 8 July 2020. The Me262 became operational in July 1944, about the same time as the British Gloster Meteor. The great FAA test pilot Eric ‘Winkle’ Brown considered the Me262 the best fighter of WWII, a generation ahead of any other. By comparison, the British Gloster Meteor was essentially a piston engine design with jets instead of piton engines. The Me 262 had highly advanced aerodynamics with its shark-like fuselage and swept back tail. It had a very heavy armament of 4x30mm MK108 cannon and, on some aircraft, 24x55mm R4M air-to-air missiles. Moreover, its Junkers Jumo 004 engines were of the axial-flow type, which was the way ahead for jet engines compared to the centrifugal-flow Rolls Royce Wellands of the Meteor. The only rather conservative feature was the centrally-placed cockpit. That might have been the traditional position for a single-seat fighter (though not a twin engine one) but the Meteor had the cockpit well-placed forward. The Me262 was not without its faults as a combat aircraft. Lacking dive breaks, the Me262’s approach speed to a slow bomber formation was so high that there was not sufficient time to aim the guns before the Me262 had to break so the pilot had to hope for the best when firing. As a result, tactics were devised of a ‘Wolf Pack’ of Me262’s firing a salvo of R4M rockets from the flank of a bomer formation, and trust some would hit a bomber (which often happened). Moreover, the Me262 was extremely vulnerable on take-off and landing, when the majority of Me262’s were shot down, because of the low thrust at slow speeds and the poor throttle response of early jet engines. Many were also destroyed on the ground. Me262 pilots thought the Hawker Tempest their most formidable opponent. The engines suffered from reliability problems because their sophisticated design had entailed design compromises whilst the substitution of poor materials because of the lack of high grade metals which the engine had been designed to use exacerbated the problems. The service intervals between overhauls was extremely short - a mere 10-20 hours compared to the conservative, but reliable, Welland’s 180 hours. By the end of the war, many Me262’s remained grounded because of lack of jet fuel and replacement engine parts. Out of 1,430 built no more than 200 were operational at any one time. After the war, it was revealed that many hundreds were under construction in dispersed facilities and underground caves/factories and that tens of thousands of slave labourers had died in their production. The aircraft is in a basic RLM 76/83 camouflage: undersurfaces RLM76 Light Grey Blue, upper surfaces RLM83 Dark Green. |
Date | |
Source | Messerschmitt Me262A-1a Schwalbe |
Author | Hugh Llewelyn from Keynsham, UK |
Camera location | 52° 38′ 31.28″ N, 2° 18′ 33.08″ W | View this and other nearby images on: OpenStreetMap | 52.642021; -2.309188 |
---|
Licensing
[edit]- You are free:
- to share – to copy, distribute and transmit the work
- to remix – to adapt the work
- Under the following conditions:
- attribution – You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- share alike – If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same or compatible license as the original.
This image was originally posted to Flickr by hugh llewelyn at https://flickr.com/photos/58433307@N08/50111729907. It was reviewed on 17 July 2020 by FlickreviewR 2 and was confirmed to be licensed under the terms of the cc-by-sa-2.0. |
17 July 2020
File history
Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.
Date/Time | Thumbnail | Dimensions | User | Comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
current | 19:30, 17 July 2020 | 6,000 × 4,000 (6.66 MB) | Tm (talk | contribs) | Transferred from Flickr via #flickr2commons |
You cannot overwrite this file.
File usage on Commons
There are no pages that use this file.
Metadata
This file contains additional information such as Exif metadata which may have been added by the digital camera, scanner, or software program used to create or digitize it. If the file has been modified from its original state, some details such as the timestamp may not fully reflect those of the original file. The timestamp is only as accurate as the clock in the camera, and it may be completely wrong.
Camera manufacturer | NIKON CORPORATION |
---|---|
Camera model | NIKON D5300 |
Exposure time | 1/80 sec (0.0125) |
F-number | f/4.5 |
ISO speed rating | 400 |
Date and time of data generation | 13:09, 8 July 2020 |
Lens focal length | 18 mm |
Orientation | Normal |
Horizontal resolution | 300 dpi |
Vertical resolution | 300 dpi |
Software used | Ver.1.01 |
File change date and time | 13:09, 8 July 2020 |
Y and C positioning | Centered |
Exposure Program | Not defined |
Exif version | 2.3 |
Date and time of digitizing | 13:09, 8 July 2020 |
Meaning of each component |
|
Image compression mode | 2 |
APEX exposure bias | 0 |
Maximum land aperture | 3 APEX (f/2.83) |
Metering mode | Pattern |
Light source | Unknown |
Flash | Flash did not fire, auto mode |
DateTime subseconds | 60 |
DateTimeOriginal subseconds | 60 |
DateTimeDigitized subseconds | 60 |
Supported Flashpix version | 1 |
Color space | sRGB |
Sensing method | One-chip color area sensor |
File source | Digital still camera |
Scene type | A directly photographed image |
Custom image processing | Normal process |
Exposure mode | Auto exposure |
White balance | Auto white balance |
Digital zoom ratio | 1 |
Focal length in 35 mm film | 27 mm |
Scene capture type | Standard |
Scene control | Low gain up |
Contrast | Normal |
Saturation | Normal |
Sharpness | Normal |
Subject distance range | Unknown |
GPS tag version | 0.0.3.2 |
Rating (out of 5) | 0 |