File:Journée Wikipédia, objet scientifique 2013 07 Régine Fabri2.jpg
Original file (2,016 × 1,662 pixels, file size: 440 KB, MIME type: image/jpeg)
Captions
Summary
[edit]DescriptionJournée Wikipédia, objet scientifique 2013 07 Régine Fabri2.jpg |
Français : Régine Fabri, chef de travaux, gestionnaire de la bibliothèque du Jardin botanique national de Belgique ; ici en train de faire un exposé sur le thème : « Chercheur en botanique, contributeur et utilisateur de Wikipédia, un défi à relever » ; ici lors de la Journée d’étude : « Wikipédia, objet scientifique non identifié », organisée par le « Projet exploratoire » WEUSC ; 5 juin 2013 à l’Institut des sciences de la communication du CNRS (ISCC, Paris). -> 1) Quels usages actuels et potentiels de Wikipédia dans les domaines des sciences, de l’éducation et de la documentation ; 2) point sur les méthodologies et les travaux d’évaluation des connaissances sur Wikipédia ; propositions de nouvelles approches d’expertises par la recherche dans un contexte interdisciplinaire. Objet de la journée : analyser les rapports que scientifiques et sciences entretiennent avec Wikipédia autour de 3 problématiques : 1. place de l’expertise et celle du chercheur-contributeur ou expert dans Wikipédia ; 2. gouvernance de Wikipédia, de ses régimes d’édition, de ses enjeux de neutralité, de ses sources ; 3. Wikipédia comme objet de recherche, de corpus ou terrain d’analyse.English: Régine Fabri, chef de travaux, gestionnaire de la bibliothèque du Jardin botanique national de Belgique ; ici en train de faire un exposé sur le thème « Chercheur en botanique, contributeur et utilisateur de Wikipédia, un défi à relever » during Study Day "Wikipedia, unidentified scientific object" June 5, 2013 - Institute of Communication Sciences of the CNRS (ISCC, Paris), organized by the "Pathfinder Project" WEUSC -> 1) What current and potential uses of Wikipedia in the fields of science, education and documentation, 2) review the methodologies and assessment work on Wikipedia knowledge, proposals for new approaches expertise through research in an interdisciplinary context. Subject of the day: analyze reports that scientists and science have with Wikipedia around three issues: 1. up expertise and that of the researcher or expert contributor to Wikipedia; 2. Wikipedia governance, its publishing systems, its issues of neutrality, its sources; 3. Wikipedia as a research subject, or field of corpus analysis. |
Date | |
Source | Own work |
Author | Lamiot |
Personality rightsAlthough this work is freely licensed or in the public domain, the person(s) shown may have rights that legally restrict certain re-uses unless those depicted consent to such uses. In these cases, a model release or other evidence of consent could protect you from infringement claims. Though not obliged to do so, the uploader may be able to help you to obtain such evidence. See our general disclaimer for more information. |
Licensing
[edit]- You are free:
- to share – to copy, distribute and transmit the work
- to remix – to adapt the work
- Under the following conditions:
- attribution – You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- share alike – If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same or compatible license as the original.
File history
Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.
Date/Time | Thumbnail | Dimensions | User | Comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
current | 19:48, 7 June 2013 | 2,016 × 1,662 (440 KB) | Lamiot (talk | contribs) | User created page with UploadWizard |
You cannot overwrite this file.
File usage on Commons
The following page uses this file:
File usage on other wikis
The following other wikis use this file:
- Usage on en.wikipedia.org
- Usage on es.wikipedia.org
- Usage on nl.wikipedia.org
- Usage on www.wikidata.org
Metadata
This file contains additional information such as Exif metadata which may have been added by the digital camera, scanner, or software program used to create or digitize it. If the file has been modified from its original state, some details such as the timestamp may not fully reflect those of the original file. The timestamp is only as accurate as the clock in the camera, and it may be completely wrong.
Camera manufacturer | NIKON CORPORATION |
---|---|
Camera model | NIKON D7000 |
Exposure time | 1/60 sec (0.016666666666667) |
F-number | f/5.6 |
ISO speed rating | 560 |
Date and time of data generation | 10:30, 5 June 2013 |
Lens focal length | 105 mm |
Orientation | Normal |
Horizontal resolution | 300 dpi |
Vertical resolution | 300 dpi |
Software used | Adobe Photoshop CS2 Windows |
File change date and time | 16:06, 6 June 2013 |
Y and C positioning | Co-sited |
Exposure Program | Not defined |
Exif version | 2.3 |
Date and time of digitizing | 10:30, 5 June 2013 |
Meaning of each component |
|
Image compression mode | 2 |
APEX exposure bias | 0 |
Maximum land aperture | 5 APEX (f/5.66) |
Metering mode | Pattern |
Light source | Unknown |
Flash | Flash did not fire, compulsory flash suppression |
DateTime subseconds | 10 |
DateTimeOriginal subseconds | 10 |
DateTimeDigitized subseconds | 10 |
Supported Flashpix version | 1 |
Color space | sRGB |
Sensing method | One-chip color area sensor |
File source | Digital still camera |
Scene type | A directly photographed image |
Custom image processing | Normal process |
Exposure mode | Auto exposure |
White balance | Auto white balance |
Digital zoom ratio | 1 |
Focal length in 35 mm film | 157 mm |
Scene capture type | Standard |
Scene control | Low gain up |
Contrast | Normal |
Saturation | Normal |
Sharpness | Normal |
Subject distance range | Unknown |
GPS tag version | 2.3.0.0 |
Supported Flashpix version | 1 |
Image width | 2,016 px |
Image height | 1,662 px |
Date metadata was last modified | 18:06, 6 June 2013 |
IIM version | 2 |