File:Journée Wikipédia, objet scientifique 2013Camille Paloque-Berges.JPG
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Size of this preview: 763 × 600 pixels. Other resolutions: 305 × 240 pixels | 611 × 480 pixels | 977 × 768 pixels | 1,280 × 1,006 pixels | 2,560 × 2,012 pixels | 3,496 × 2,748 pixels.
Original file (3,496 × 2,748 pixels, file size: 1.1 MB, MIME type: image/jpeg)
Captions
Captions
Add a one-line explanation of what this file represents
Summary
[edit]
| Description |
Français : Camille Paloque-Berges, chercheuse, Dicen, Cnam en train d'animer la 3e table ronde (intitulée « Corpus et terrains ») de la Journée d’étude : « Wikipédia, objet scientifique non identifié », organisée par le « Projet exploratoire » WEUSC ; 5 juin 2013 à l’Institut des sciences de la communication du CNRS (ISCC, Paris). -> 1) Quels usages actuels et potentiels de Wikipédia dans les domaines des sciences, de l’éducation et de la documentation ; 2) point sur les méthodologies et les travaux d’évaluation des connaissances sur Wikipédia ; propositions de nouvelles approches d’expertises par la recherche dans un contexte interdisciplinaire. Objet de la journée : analyser les rapports que scientifiques et sciences entretiennent avec Wikipédia autour de 3 problématiques : 1. place de l’expertise et celle du chercheur-contributeur ou expert dans Wikipédia ; 2. gouvernance de Wikipédia, de ses régimes d’édition, de ses enjeux de neutralité, de ses sources ; 3. Wikipédia comme objet de recherche, de corpus ou terrain d’analyse.English: Camille Paloque-Berges, researcher, Dicen, CNAM currently lead the third round table (entitled "Corpus and land") of the Study Day "Wikipedia, unidentified scientific object" June 5, 2013 - Institute of Communication Sciences of the CNRS (ISCC, Paris), organized by the "Pathfinder Project" WEUSC -> 1) What current and potential uses of Wikipedia in the fields of science, education and documentation, 2) review the methodologies and assessment work on Wikipedia knowledge, proposals for new approaches expertise through research in an interdisciplinary context. Subject of the day: analyze reports that scientists and science have with Wikipedia around three issues: 1. up expertise and that of the researcher or expert contributor to Wikipedia; 2. Wikipedia governance, its publishing systems, its issues of neutrality, its sources; 3. Wikipedia as a research subject, or field of corpus analysis. |
| Date | |
| Source | Own work |
| Author | Lamiot |
Licensing
[edit]
I, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license:
This file is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported license.
- You are free:
- to share – to copy, distribute and transmit the work
- to remix – to adapt the work
- Under the following conditions:
- attribution – You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- share alike – If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same or compatible license as the original.
File history
Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.
| Date/Time | Thumbnail | Dimensions | User | Comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| current | 22:05, 7 June 2013 | | 3,496 × 2,748 (1.1 MB) | Lamiot (talk | contribs) | User created page with UploadWizard |
You cannot overwrite this file.
File usage on Commons
There are no pages that use this file.
File usage on other wikis
The following other wikis use this file:
- Usage on www.wikidata.org
