File:Intracapsular nevocellular inclusions (2904987568).jpg
Original file (1,448 × 1,448 pixels, file size: 1.17 MB, MIME type: image/jpeg)
Captions
Summary
[edit]DescriptionIntracapsular nevocellular inclusions (2904987568).jpg |
I wanted to confirm the diagnosis with immunostains, but unfortunately the area in question had already been cut through. However, I think it's safe to call the node negative for metastases, because, 1) the lesion is definitely intracapsular rather than subcapsular, 2) the cells are very bland and do not resemble the cells of the actual breast tumor, and 3) the cytokeratin stain was done on all the sections taken from the axillary dissection, and it was negative. |
Date | |
Source |
Intracapsular nevocellular inclusions
|
Author | Ed Uthman from Houston, TX, USA |
Licensing
[edit]- You are free:
- to share – to copy, distribute and transmit the work
- to remix – to adapt the work
- Under the following conditions:
- attribution – You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
This image, originally posted to Flickr, was reviewed on 11 December 2013 by the administrator or reviewer File Upload Bot (Magnus Manske), who confirmed that it was available on Flickr under the stated license on that date. |
File history
Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.
Date/Time | Thumbnail | Dimensions | User | Comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
current | 11:51, 11 December 2013 | 1,448 × 1,448 (1.17 MB) | File Upload Bot (Magnus Manske) (talk | contribs) | Transferred from Flickr by User:CFCF |
You cannot overwrite this file.
File usage on Commons
There are no pages that use this file.
Metadata
This file contains additional information such as Exif metadata which may have been added by the digital camera, scanner, or software program used to create or digitize it. If the file has been modified from its original state, some details such as the timestamp may not fully reflect those of the original file. The timestamp is only as accurate as the clock in the camera, and it may be completely wrong.
Camera manufacturer | NIKON |
---|---|
Camera model | E995 |
Exposure time | 5/179 sec (0.027932960893855) |
F-number | f/2.6 |
ISO speed rating | 100 |
Date and time of data generation | 08:58, 1 October 2008 |
Lens focal length | 8.2 mm |
Author | Picasa 2.7 |
Orientation | 0 |
Horizontal resolution | 300 dpi |
Vertical resolution | 300 dpi |
Software used | Picasa 3.0 |
File change date and time | 08:58, 1 October 2008 |
Y and C positioning | Co-sited |
Exposure Program | Normal program |
Exif version | 2.1 |
Date and time of digitizing | 08:58, 1 October 2008 |
Meaning of each component |
|
Image compression mode | 4 |
APEX exposure bias | 0.7 |
Maximum land aperture | 0 APEX (f/1) |
Metering mode | Pattern |
Light source | Unknown |
Flash | Flash did not fire |
Supported Flashpix version | 1 |
Color space | Uncalibrated |
File source | Digital still camera |
Scene type | A directly photographed image |
Unique image ID | adc733231585fd41c604df20c54d51bf |