File:Hygrocybe coccineocrenata (Peck) Arnolds 555387.jpg
![File:Hygrocybe coccineocrenata (Peck) Arnolds 555387.jpg](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/4/46/Hygrocybe_coccineocrenata_%28Peck%29_Arnolds_555387.jpg/800px-Hygrocybe_coccineocrenata_%28Peck%29_Arnolds_555387.jpg?20180315010705)
Original file (3,648 × 2,736 pixels, file size: 2.09 MB, MIME type: image/jpeg)
Captions
Captions
Summary
[edit]DescriptionHygrocybe coccineocrenata (Peck) Arnolds 555387.jpg |
Hygrocybe coccineocrenata var. sphagnophila (Peck) Arnolds Image location: York Co., Maine, USA Re: Hygrocybe coccineocrenata var. sphagnophila. Since you are the only person with an observation under this species, I thought I would pick your brain on the H.turunda group. Your species here looks to have been pulled out of the H.turunda group – is that assumption correct? And if so can the assumption take one more step and assume that H.turunda then stands alone as a good species? ………..I’m seeing a lot of small Hygrocybe with decurrent gills with squamulous that are clearly brown. So H.turunda? Recognized by sight: Reddish scales on pileus. https://books.google.com/...
|
||
Date | Taken on 10 September 2015 | ||
Source |
|
||
Author |
|
Licensing
[edit]![w:en:Creative Commons](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/7/79/CC_some_rights_reserved.svg/90px-CC_some_rights_reserved.svg.png)
![attribution](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/1/11/Cc-by_new_white.svg/24px-Cc-by_new_white.svg.png)
![share alike](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/d/df/Cc-sa_white.svg/24px-Cc-sa_white.svg.png)
- You are free:
- to share – to copy, distribute and transmit the work
- to remix – to adapt the work
- Under the following conditions:
- attribution – You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- share alike – If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same or compatible license as the original.
![]() |
This file, which was originally posted to
https://mushroomobserver.org/image/show_image/555387, was reviewed on 15 March 2018 by reviewer MB298, who confirmed that it was available there under the stated license on that date.
|
File history
Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.
Date/Time | Thumbnail | Dimensions | User | Comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
current | 01:07, 15 March 2018 | ![]() | 3,648 × 2,736 (2.09 MB) | Leoboudv (talk | contribs) | =={{int:filedesc}}== {{Information |Description='''''Hygrocybe coccineocrenata''''' var. sphagnophila (Peck) Arnolds Image location: York Co., Maine, USA Re: Hygrocybe coccineocrenata var. sphagnophila. Since you are the only person with an observation under this species, I thought I would pick your brain on the H.turunda group. Your species here looks to have been pulled out of the H.turunda group – is that assumption correct? And if so can the assumption take one more step and assume that H.turunda then stands alone as a good species? ………..I’m seeing a lot of small Hygrocybe with decurrent gills with squamulous that are clearly brown. So H.turunda? <div> <span> Recognized by sight: Reddish scales on pileus. [https://books.google.com/books?id=Z-xGzC7Nic4C&pg=PA98&lpg=PA98&dq=Hygrocybe+coccineocrenata+var.+sphagnophila&source=bl&ots=VL-A_KhQV5&sig=9Y02nKfb_g10zEnZLeVXxWpPVZ0&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwj_hYaEpK_MAhVDGR4KHSdBBeAQ6AEIMDAD#v=onepage&q=Hygroc... |
You cannot overwrite this file.
File usage on Commons
There are no pages that use this file.
File usage on other wikis
The following other wikis use this file:
- Usage on cs.wikipedia.org
Metadata
This file contains additional information such as Exif metadata which may have been added by the digital camera, scanner, or software program used to create or digitize it. If the file has been modified from its original state, some details such as the timestamp may not fully reflect those of the original file. The timestamp is only as accurate as the clock in the camera, and it may be completely wrong.
Camera manufacturer | Canon |
---|---|
Camera model | Canon PowerShot A490 |
Exposure time | 1/50 sec (0.02) |
F-number | f/3 |
ISO speed rating | 400 |
Date and time of data generation | 00:01, 1 January 1980 |
Lens focal length | 6.6 mm |
Orientation | Normal |
Horizontal resolution | 180 dpi |
Vertical resolution | 180 dpi |
File change date and time | 00:01, 1 January 1980 |
Y and C positioning | Co-sited |
Exif version | 2.21 |
Date and time of digitizing | 00:01, 1 January 1980 |
Meaning of each component |
|
Image compression mode | 3 |
APEX shutter speed | 5.65625 |
APEX aperture | 3.15625 |
APEX exposure bias | 0 |
Maximum land aperture | 3.15625 APEX (f/2.99) |
Metering mode | Pattern |
Flash | Flash did not fire, compulsory flash suppression |