File:How does news returned in Google search results affect belief in misinformation? (Study 5) - excluding original article in search results analysis.webp
From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Size of this PNG preview of this WEBP file: 672 × 599 pixels. Other resolutions: 269 × 240 pixels | 538 × 480 pixels | 861 × 768 pixels | 1,148 × 1,024 pixels | 2,094 × 1,868 pixels.
Original file (2,094 × 1,868 pixels, file size: 186 KB, MIME type: image/webp)
File information
Structured data
Captions
Summary
[edit]DescriptionHow does news returned in Google search results affect belief in misinformation? (Study 5) - excluding original article in search results analysis.webp |
English: "Panel a presents the proportion of individuals who, when searching online about a false/misleading or true article, are exposed to different levels of unreliable news sites in Google search results. Panel b presents the average treatment effects and 95 percent confidence intervals for linear regression models measuring the effect of searching online during Study 5 (N = 1,485) as a unit of the standard deviation of the dependent variable. Searching online increased the probability a respondent rated a false/misleading article as true. Subsetting the treatment group by the quality of news returned in their search engine results, Panel c and d present these same average treatment effects and 95 percent confidence intervals. Panel c shows that the probability an individual rates misinformation as true is higher than the control group among respondents who are exposed to at least one unreliable news site (N = 986). The probability an individual a false/misleading article as true is not different than the control group among respondents who are exposed to only very reliable news (N = 958). Panel d shows that the probability an individual rates a false/misleading article as true than the control group among respondents who are exposed to the lowest quartile of news quality (N = 1,006) and second lowest quartile of news quality (N = 1,005). The probability an individual rates a false/misleading article as true is not different than the control group among respondents who are exposed to the second highest quartile of news quality (N = 1,005) and the highest quartile of news quality (N = 1,006). All effects are estimated using ordinary least squares with article fixed effects and standard errors clustered at the individual and article level.
Source Data" |
Date | |
Source | https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-023-06883-y |
Author | Authors of the study: Kevin Aslett, Zeve Sanderson, William Godel, Nathaniel Persily, Jonathan Nagler & Joshua A. Tucker |
Licensing
[edit]This file is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.
- You are free:
- to share – to copy, distribute and transmit the work
- to remix – to adapt the work
- Under the following conditions:
- attribution – You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
File history
Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.
Date/Time | Thumbnail | Dimensions | User | Comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
current | 22:32, 4 March 2024 | 2,094 × 1,868 (186 KB) | Prototyperspective (talk | contribs) | Uploaded a work by Authors of the study: Kevin Aslett, Zeve Sanderson, William Godel, Nathaniel Persily, Jonathan Nagler & Joshua A. Tucker from https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-023-06883-y with UploadWizard |
You cannot overwrite this file.
File usage on Commons
There are no pages that use this file.