File:Haringey's Parking Charges.jpg
![File:Haringey's Parking Charges.jpg](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/5/58/Haringey%27s_Parking_Charges.jpg/448px-Haringey%27s_Parking_Charges.jpg?20211221180040)
Original file (2,130 × 2,850 pixels, file size: 1.08 MB, MIME type: image/jpeg)
Captions
Captions
Summary
[edit]DescriptionHaringey's Parking Charges.jpg |
English: These laminated leaflets appeared in January 2011, posted in streets inside Haringey's Controlled Parking Zones (CPZs). They were part of the London Borough's statutory consultation on proposals for substantial increases in Parking Permit Charges.
In the past I've joked about some Haringey Council parking consultation leaflets. For example, one missed out the key information that charges were increasing. Another pretended that lines marking out parking bays were being "upgraded". In fact they had to be corrected because they were unlawful. But there was nothing coy or shamefaced about the leaflet in the photo. It proudly announced the price hike in full multicoloured detail. (Read it enlarged here - back button returns to this page.) A Tax In Everything But Name? The key question, of course, is whether local councils raise parking charges to balance the Parking Account - which by law they are required to do. Or is it to raise more money to fill holes in their budgets? On 14 August 2010 in a Daily Telegraph article - Motorists hit by soaring parking 'tax' - Rebecca Lefort suggested it was the latter. She commented that: "Councils have been accused of declaring war on the motorist after introducing a raft of new parking charges to plug holes in their budgets." § Similar points were made by Andrew Cooper, Kirklees Green Party councillor in a video clip from a December 2010 BBC Politics Show (Yorks & Lincs). . . . Read more here. A Price-fixing Cartel ? Also in January 2011, Flickr member Anony Pony pointed out that Haringey's Parking Account had been in healthy surplus. The Annual Report for April 2009-March 2010 (published in June 2010) showed a surplus of £3.096 million for that year. Anony also poured scorn on the justification used by Haringey Environment Department for the price hike - that it would bring Haringey's charges in line with other councils' charges. "Instead of giving us value for money", she wrote, "they seem to think having a cartel and price fixing is the way to go." The Position in 2012 Naturally I was curious to see Haringey's 2010-2011 Parking Report. It didn't appear in June 2011, nor in September. I was told it was planned for January 2012. To have at least a slim chance of getting information about the Parking Account without further delay, on 12 January 2012, I made a Freedom of Information Act (F.o.I) request. And so any Haringey resident could see it, I used the publicly accessible website WhatDoTheyKnow,com. Click the blue link to see my F.o.I request and follow-up email to Kevin Crompton, Haringey's Chief Executive. |
Date | |
Source | https://www.flickr.com/photos/53921762@N00/5375910349/ |
Author | Alan Stanton |
Camera location | 51° 35′ 40.11″ N, 0° 03′ 39.94″ W ![]() | View this and other nearby images on: OpenStreetMap | ![]() |
---|
Licensing
[edit]![w:en:Creative Commons](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/7/79/CC_some_rights_reserved.svg/90px-CC_some_rights_reserved.svg.png)
![attribution](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/1/11/Cc-by_new_white.svg/24px-Cc-by_new_white.svg.png)
![share alike](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/d/df/Cc-sa_white.svg/24px-Cc-sa_white.svg.png)
- You are free:
- to share – to copy, distribute and transmit the work
- to remix – to adapt the work
- Under the following conditions:
- attribution – You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- share alike – If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same or compatible license as the original.
![]() |
This image was originally posted to Flickr by Alan Stanton at https://flickr.com/photos/53921762@N00/5375910349. It was reviewed on 21 December 2021 by FlickreviewR 2 and was confirmed to be licensed under the terms of the cc-by-sa-2.0. |
21 December 2021
File history
Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.
Date/Time | Thumbnail | Dimensions | User | Comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
current | 18:00, 21 December 2021 | ![]() | 2,130 × 2,850 (1.08 MB) | SteinsplitterBot (talk | contribs) | Bot: Image rotated by 270° (EXIF-Orientation set from 6 to 1, rotated 0°) |
15:44, 21 December 2021 | ![]() | 2,850 × 2,130 (1.08 MB) | Oxyman (talk | contribs) | Uploaded a work by Alan Stanton from https://www.flickr.com/photos/53921762@N00/5375910349/ with UploadWizard |
You cannot overwrite this file.
File usage on Commons
There are no pages that use this file.
Metadata
This file contains additional information such as Exif metadata which may have been added by the digital camera, scanner, or software program used to create or digitize it. If the file has been modified from its original state, some details such as the timestamp may not fully reflect those of the original file. The timestamp is only as accurate as the clock in the camera, and it may be completely wrong.
Camera manufacturer | Canon |
---|---|
Camera model | Canon PowerShot A640 |
Orientation | Normal |
Horizontal resolution | 180 dpi |
Vertical resolution | 180 dpi |
File change date and time | 21:23, 21 January 2011 |
Y and C positioning | Centered |
IIM version | 2 |