File:Gradierwerk bei Nacht (10567473175).jpg
From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Size of this preview: 800 × 533 pixels. Other resolutions: 320 × 213 pixels | 640 × 427 pixels | 1,024 × 683 pixels | 1,500 × 1,000 pixels.
Original file (1,500 × 1,000 pixels, file size: 565 KB, MIME type: image/jpeg)
File information
Structured data
Captions
Summary
[edit]DescriptionGradierwerk bei Nacht (10567473175).jpg |
Deutsch: Gradierwerk bei Nacht, Kurpark Hamm |
Date | |
Source | Gradierwerk bei Nacht |
Author | Dirk Vorderstraße |
Licensing
[edit]This file is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 Generic license.
- You are free:
- to share – to copy, distribute and transmit the work
- to remix – to adapt the work
- Under the following conditions:
- attribution – You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
This image was originally posted to Flickr by dirkvorderstrasse at https://www.flickr.com/photos/107086296@N08/10567473175. It was reviewed on 29 March 2014 by FlickreviewR and was confirmed to be licensed under the terms of the cc-by-2.0. |
29 March 2014
File history
Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.
Date/Time | Thumbnail | Dimensions | User | Comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
current | 18:22, 29 March 2014 | 1,500 × 1,000 (565 KB) | Russavia (talk | contribs) | Transferred from Flickr |
You cannot overwrite this file.
File usage on Commons
There are no pages that use this file.
Metadata
This file contains additional information such as Exif metadata which may have been added by the digital camera, scanner, or software program used to create or digitize it. If the file has been modified from its original state, some details such as the timestamp may not fully reflect those of the original file. The timestamp is only as accurate as the clock in the camera, and it may be completely wrong.
JPEG file comment | CREATOR: gd-jpeg v1.0 (using IJG JPEG v62), quality = 95 |
---|