File:Fortification Design — 1862 Peninsula Campaign — (3446748952).jpg
Original file (1,600 × 966 pixels, file size: 551 KB, MIME type: image/jpeg)
Captions
Summary
[edit]DescriptionFortification Design — 1862 Peninsula Campaign — (3446748952).jpg |
Inscription. The Confederate field fortifications constructed on the Virginia Peninsula were influenced by seventeenth-century French military engineer Marshal Sebastien le Prestre de Vauban and nineteenth-century American engineering professor Dennis Hart Mahan. Vauban designed superior fortresses with many fronts and bastions which presented an impenetrable defense in depth. He also revolutionized siegeworks by developing a system of parallels and zig-zag trenches for reducing fortresses with only minimal casualties to the attacking force. Vauban built over 30 fortresses, conducted 50 sieges, and wrote several engineering texts during his 50-year military career. His designs and writings influenced military engineers into the twentieth century. Mahan graduated from West Point in 1824 and studied military engineering in Europe from 1826-30. He spent his last year at the French military school of engineers and artillery in Metz. There he read texts influenced by Vauban. Mahan returned to West Point in 1830 and taught there until 1871. As professor of engineering, Mahan instructed virtually every West Pointer who later served in the Confederate or Union armies. He wrote many articles and books during his 39-year tenure. His Triest on Field Fortifications was used extensively by Civil War engineers for constructing redoubts, bastion fortifications, redans and other earthworks. The fortifications at Lee’s Mill contained two types of earthworks detailed in Mahan’s book. The first was the breastwork with its chest-high parapet and interior ditch for protecting infantrymen. The second was the redoubt for mounting artillery pieces. This many sided fortification provided protection from enemy fire and slowed their advance. Confederate engineers Isaac St. John and Alfred Rives astutely situated the earthworks along the Warwick River and three redoubts above on the heights. Their fortification designs incorporated the natural landscape and delayed the Union advance from Fort Monroe and Camp Butler at Newport News Point. This marker is included in the Virginia Civil War Trails marker series. www.hmdb.org/Marker.asp?Marker=11333 |
Date | |
Source |
Fortification Design — 1862 Peninsula Campaign —
|
Author | Cliff from Arlington, Virginia, USA |
Camera location | 37° 09′ 51.79″ N, 76° 33′ 54.28″ W | View this and other nearby images on: OpenStreetMap | 37.164386; -76.565078 |
---|
Licensing
[edit]- You are free:
- to share – to copy, distribute and transmit the work
- to remix – to adapt the work
- Under the following conditions:
- attribution – You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
This image, originally posted to Flickr, was reviewed on 16 November 2013 by the administrator or reviewer File Upload Bot (Magnus Manske), who confirmed that it was available on Flickr under the stated license on that date. |
File history
Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.
Date/Time | Thumbnail | Dimensions | User | Comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
current | 17:49, 16 November 2013 | 1,600 × 966 (551 KB) | File Upload Bot (Magnus Manske) (talk | contribs) | Transferred from Flickr by User:AlbertHerring |
You cannot overwrite this file.
File usage on Commons
There are no pages that use this file.
Metadata
This file contains additional information such as Exif metadata which may have been added by the digital camera, scanner, or software program used to create or digitize it. If the file has been modified from its original state, some details such as the timestamp may not fully reflect those of the original file. The timestamp is only as accurate as the clock in the camera, and it may be completely wrong.
Camera manufacturer | NIKON |
---|---|
Camera model | COOLPIX P6000 |
Exposure time | 1/100 sec (0.01) |
F-number | f/3.2 |
ISO speed rating | 64 |
Date and time of data generation | 09:32, 15 April 2009 |
Lens focal length | 6 mm |
Latitude | 37° 9′ 51.79″ N |
Longitude | 76° 33′ 54.28″ W |
Orientation | Normal |
Horizontal resolution | 240 dpi |
Vertical resolution | 240 dpi |
Software used | ACD Systems Digital Imaging |
File change date and time | 23:48, 15 April 2009 |
Y and C positioning | Centered |
Exposure Program | Normal program |
Exif version | 2.21 |
Date and time of digitizing | 09:32, 15 April 2009 |
APEX shutter speed | 6.643856 |
APEX aperture | 3.356144 |
APEX exposure bias | 0 |
Maximum land aperture | 2.9 APEX (f/2.73) |
Metering mode | Pattern |
Light source | Unknown |
Flash | Flash did not fire, compulsory flash suppression |
DateTime subseconds | 281 |
DateTimeOriginal subseconds | 0 |
DateTimeDigitized subseconds | 0 |
Sensing method | One-chip color area sensor |
File source | Digital still camera |
Scene type | A directly photographed image |
Custom image processing | Normal process |
Exposure mode | Auto exposure |
White balance | Auto white balance |
Digital zoom ratio | 0 |
Focal length in 35 mm film | 28 mm |
Scene capture type | Standard |
Scene control | None |
Contrast | Normal |
Saturation | Normal |
Sharpness | Normal |
Subject distance range | Unknown |
GPS time (atomic clock) | 06:32 |
Satellites used for measurement | 05 |
Geodetic survey data used | WGS-84 |
GPS date | 15 April 2009 |
GPS tag version | 84.64.84.64.05.64.05 |
Width | 4,224 px |
Height | 3,168 px |
Image width | 4,224 px |
Image height | 3,168 px |