File:Florists' review (microform) (1912) (16520767019).jpg

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Original file(1,630 × 2,734 pixels, file size: 534 KB, MIME type: image/jpeg)

Captions

Captions

Add a one-line explanation of what this file represents

Summary

[edit]
Description
English:

Title: Florists' review (microform)
Identifier: 5205536_51_1 (find matches)
Year: 1912 (1910s)
Authors:
Subjects: Floriculture
Publisher: Chicago : Florists' Pub. Co
Contributing Library: University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
Digitizing Sponsor: University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign

View Book Page: Book Viewer
About This Book: Catalog Entry
View All Images: All Images From Book
Click here to view book online to see this illustration in context in a browseable online version of this book.

Text Appearing Before Image:
■■,-'f.'-Ts;7^rfj»^ • NOVEMBEK 23, 1922 The Florists^ Review 29 stated, should stop when the flower buds begin to show color, because the solution is likely to discolor the flowers and would be no longer needed, at any rate, as the plants would then be so far advanced as to be beyond serious dan- ger from the mites. At this time, how- ever, a daily or twice-daily spraying with clear water may be substituted for the nicotine spraying, if the weather is favorable. CHRYSANTHEMUM SOCIETY. Examining Committees. The committees appointed by the Chrysanthemum Society of America to examine new varieties of chrysanthe- mums have submitted reports of the season as follows: At Chicago, November 10, Monarch, white, in- curved, submitted by the B. O. Hill Co., Rich- mond, Ind., scored aa follows on the exhibition scale: Color, 14; stem, 5; foliage, 4; fullness, 15; form, 14; depth, 15; size. 28; total, 95. At Chicago, November 16, Giant White, cre,imy white, incurved, submitted by the B. G. Hill Co., scored as follows on the exhibition scale: Color, 13; stera^ 5; foliage, 4; fullness, 15; form, 14; depth, 15; size, 28; total, 94. At Madison, N. J., Noveml)er 4, Mrs. H. K. Knapp, yellow, single and large-flowered, sub- mitted by Robert H. Liclcman's Brookwood Gar- dens, Bast Islip, N. Y., scored as follows; Color, 38; form, 18; substance, 18; stem and foliage, 17; total, 91. At Cincinnati, O., November 4, Laelia, deep pinlc, anemone, submitted by Elmer D. Smith & Co., Adrian, Mich., scored as follows: Color, 37; form, 19; stem and foliage, 19; fullness, 18; total, 93. At Chicago, III., November 8, Narada, yellow, pompon and disbudded, submitted by Elmer D. Smith & Co., scored as follows: Color, 32; form, 20; stem and foliage, 20; fullness. 20; total. 92. At Cincinnati, O., November 4, Narada, yellow, pompon and disbudded, submitted by Elmer D. Smith & Co., scored as follows: Color, 38; form, 19; stem and foliage, 19; fullness, 19; total, 95. At Chicago, November 11, Primrose Gem, light yellow, button pompon, submitted by Charles Elliott, Park Ridge, 111., scored ns follows: Color, 28; form, 18; stem and foliage, 18; full- ness, 18; total, 82. At Chicago, November 11, Remembrnnce, white, tinted with pink; single, submitted by Charles Elliott, scored as follows: Color, 30; form. 12; substance, 15; stem and foliage, 18; total, 75. At Chicago, November 11, Golden Secret, golden yellow, button pompon, submitted by Charles Elliott, scored as follows: Color, 34; form, 18; stem and foliage, 18; fullness, 18; total, 88. At Chicago, November 11, Armistice Day, pure white, single, submitted by Charles Elliott, scored as follows: Color, 36; form, 18; sub- stance, 16; stem and foliage, 18; total. 88. At Cincinnati, O., November 12, Beautiful, white, anemone, submitted by W. F. Rirhter, Cullman, Ala., scored as follows: Color, .30; form. 14; substance, 18; stem and foliage, 16; total, 78. At Chicago. November 16, Rosa Raisa. light pink, incurved, submitted by Elmer I). Smith & Co., scored as follows on tlie exhihitinn scile: Color. 14; stem, 4: foiiaite. 4; fullness, 1.1; form, 15; depth, 15; size, 2."i; total, 92. At Chicago, November 16. Bronzito, bronze, button pompon, submitted by Elmer 1). Smith & Co.. scored us follows: Color. .30; form, lo; stem and foliage, 15: fullness. 15: total, 75. At Chicago, November 10, Carneto, lit'ht pink, incurved, submitted by Elmer D. Smith & Co., scored as fullows on the exhibition scmIc: Color. 14: stem, 5: foliage, 3: fullness, 15; form, 15; depth, 15; size. 28: total, 95. At Chic.igo, Novembj'r Ki, Klorera. sulphur yellow, .■ineinone, submitted by Elmer D. Smith & Co., scored as follows: Color, 30; form, IS; substance, 18; stem and foliage, 16; total, 82. Charles W. Johnson, Sec 'y. PROFIT IN TULIPS. Grown in America. Most of the tulip bulbs used in this country are imported, but good tulips can be grown here at a profit, says the United States Department of Agricul- ture, in department bulletin 1082, "The Production of Tulip Bulbs," by Dr. David Griffiths. The bulbs are already being grown in commercial quantities by three or four companies in southern Michigan, by an association in the Wil- lamette valley, of Oregon, by a firm in
Text Appearing After Image:
A—Cyclamen leaves showing the distortion to the leaves due to the at- tacks of the cyclamen mite. B—Cyclamen flowers showing the streaked parts due to attacks of the mites. This injury is usually ac- complished in the young bud stage. C—A large cyclamen leaf, showing the curling and galling effect due to the mites, and young flower buds into the innermost parts of which the mites enter, resulting in the streaked flciwers shown in figure B. D—Young cyclamen leaves with the I>eouliar curling due to attacks of the mites, together with an older leaf witli a slight curling at the lobes caused by mite attacks while the leaf was young. Views of Cyclamen Leaves and Flowers Showing Effect of ttie Mite. northwestern California, another in the Norfolk region of Virginia and in a smaller way in a score of localities. The Department of Agriculture has been growing them successfully on Puget sound, in the state of Washington. "There is no limit," says the bul- letin, "to the quantity of bulbs which it is possible to produce in the United States. We have climates that are un- excelled, regions with an abundant moisture supply from October to June, dry summers, "fertile sands, inexhausti- ble loams and deep, friable silts. The tulips already produced experimentally by the department are as good as the best. They bed, force, produce and reproduce 'normally under American conditions. The industry of bulb pro- duction on a large scale, however, must develop slowly, for experience is neces- sary, and it is probable that for a long time the home-grown supply will be only supplementary to existing sources." Cultural Information Obtainable. The bulletin contains full discussions on the culture of tulips, harvesting the flowers and bulbs, packing, shipping, enemies, and performance records of many varieties. Summed up in small space, some of the rules for successful tulip culture laid down by the depart- ment are: Do not plant on lean soil; use the most available source of fer-

Note About Images

Please note that these images are extracted from scanned page images that may have been digitally enhanced for readability - coloration and appearance of these illustrations may not perfectly resemble the original work.
Date
Source

https://www.flickr.com/photos/internetarchivebookimages/16520767019/

Author Internet Archive Book Images
Permission
(Reusing this file)
At the time of upload, the image license was automatically confirmed using the Flickr API. For more information see Flickr API detail.
Flickr tags
InfoField
  • bookid:5205536_51_1
  • bookyear:1912
  • bookdecade:1910
  • bookcentury:1900
  • booksubject:Floriculture
  • bookpublisher:Chicago_Florists_Pub_Co
  • bookcontributor:University_of_Illinois_Urbana_Champaign
  • booksponsor:University_of_Illinois_Urbana_Champaign
  • bookleafnumber:684
  • bookcollection:microfilm
  • bookcollection:additional_collections
  • BHL Collection
Flickr posted date
InfoField
3 March 2015



Licensing

[edit]
This image was taken from Flickr's The Commons. The uploading organization may have various reasons for determining that no known copyright restrictions exist, such as:
  1. The copyright is in the public domain because it has expired;
  2. The copyright was injected into the public domain for other reasons, such as failure to adhere to required formalities or conditions;
  3. The institution owns the copyright but is not interested in exercising control; or
  4. The institution has legal rights sufficient to authorize others to use the work without restrictions.

More information can be found at https://flickr.com/commons/usage/.


Please add additional copyright tags to this image if more specific information about copyright status can be determined. See Commons:Licensing for more information.
This image was originally posted to Flickr by Internet Archive Book Images at https://flickr.com/photos/126377022@N07/16520767019. It was reviewed on 6 October 2015 by FlickreviewR and was confirmed to be licensed under the terms of the No known copyright restrictions.

6 October 2015

File history

Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.

Date/TimeThumbnailDimensionsUserComment
current20:43, 6 October 2015Thumbnail for version as of 20:43, 6 October 20151,630 × 2,734 (534 KB) (talk | contribs)== {{int:filedesc}} == {{information |description={{en|1=<br> '''Title''': Florists' review (microform)<br> '''Identifier''': 5205536_51_1 ([https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ASearch&profile=default&fulltext=Search&search=insourc...

There are no pages that use this file.