File:Florists' review (microform) (16679628402).jpg

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Original file(1,630 × 1,940 pixels, file size: 290 KB, MIME type: image/jpeg)

Captions

Captions

Add a one-line explanation of what this file represents

Summary

[edit]
Description
English:

Title: Florists' review (microform)
Identifier: 5205536_23_2 (find matches)
Year: [1] (s)
Authors:
Subjects: Floriculture
Publisher: Chicago : Florists' Pub. Co
Contributing Library: University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
Digitizing Sponsor: University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign

View Book Page: Book Viewer
About This Book: Catalog Entry
View All Images: All Images From Book
Click here to view book online to see this illustration in context in a browseable online version of this book.

Text Appearing Before Image:
40 The Weekly Florists^ Review* April 22, 1009. Badish promises a good crop. Celery, collards, beet, kohlrabi, leek, spinach, parsley, parsnip, mustard and endive all promise a good crop at this time. Chas. p. Braslan. SEED TRADE APPROVES. Aldrich Bill Rates Acceptable. In last week's Eeview there appeared in full those paragraphs of the Aldrich tariff bill, now pending in the United States Senate, covering the item of seeds. To most of the trade it was a surprise that the bill contained a schedule of specific duties on seeds. Even though these rates are in some cases materially higher than the old ad valorem duties, the trade in general is disposed to accept them joyously, as affording the only pos- sible relief from the vexations of the old system. The letters received by the Re- view since its publication of the sched- ules last week are here given, to show the way they have been received: Joseph Breck & Sons. Joseph Breek & Sons, Boston, tele- graph as follows: "We do not object to a moderate duty on seeds. We strongly advocate specific instead of ad valorem duties. The Al- drich bill schedule is good, but we con- sider the schedule recommended by Amer- ican Seed Trade Association and Whole- sale Seedsmen's League as being better balanced. ' * We strongly advocate specific duties on Dutch and other flowering bulbs. The seed associations suggested an admirable schedule on these as well as on seeds. D. Landreth Seed Co. Burnet Landreth, of D. Landreth Seed Co., Bristol,. Pa., writes: "This firm is well satisfied with that portion of the proposed Aldrich or Sen- ate bill as it bears on seeds; indeed, we would be satisfied with almost anything to get rid of the very inquisitive and domineering custom house methods under an ad valorem system, "All these tariff bills on seeds are in one view very funny, and funny is a small word to use, but it just suits the case in that they are so particular to enumerate: Fenugreek, cardamom, hoar- hound and St. John's bread." A. C. KendeL C. E. Kendel, of A. C. Kendel, Cleve- land, writes: "Comparing the Aldrich bill with the duties now in force, I do not think the rates excessive. The advantage of hav- ing specific duty will overbalance the ad- vance in rates on the items increased. Business can adjust itself to the new prices, as it does every year when there is a shortage. But business can not ad- just itself to the rapidly changing prices caused by the present ad valorem system. * * There is, of course, a decided in- crease in some items that are largely im- ported, over the schedule offered by the Tariff Committee of the American Seed Trade Association, and I, for one, am sorry their schedule was not more closely adhered to, but, on the other hand, the drop on cauliflower from $1 per pound to the free list, and the less decided drop on one or two other items make up in some measure the increase from 2 cents to 4 cents per pound on turnip. The bill is evidently intended to raise revenue, and it certainly will until such time as
Text Appearing After Image:
Fischer's firaod Freesia PURITY Tbe unequaled 'white daooratlve Freesia. Send in your orders early if you want the large sizes, as I am bookinK large orders for tbem now and will have to refuse orders for mammoth, althouf^h 1 will have many more bulbs than other years. Our stock is absolutely pure, as great pains is taken to remove any rogues, as they may appear, and all seed pods are removed, avoiding all danger of mixture, as Purity does not come true from seed. Dealers getting their stock from us, will always be lure to get the purest of stock. For Sale by the Leadlnc Beedamen. RUDOLPH FISCHER, R.F.D.,San Gabriel, Cal. Mention The Keview when you •Write American growers will produce stocks equal to imported of some varieties. *' I have written to Senator Aldrich suggesting a duty of 5 cents per pound on yellow trefoil, clean seed or in mixture with other seeds. If the grass seed men intend to put an end to the adulteration of clover and alfalfa they have a good opportunity to get in a few licks where it will count. Such a duty will not injure the legitimate use for yellow trefoil, and it will discourage its use for other pur- poses. Northrup, King & G). J. E. Northrup, of Northrup, King & Co., Minneapolis, writes: "We have not had time to closely scan the proposed Aldrich bill, but it appears to amount for the most part to a very considerable increase in duties. However, it will be a blessing to get specific duties, but 5 cents a pound is certainly suflScient on all seeds not especially provided for in Section 1, and we hope that an amend- ment may be secured to that effect. We are writing our senators urging such Catalogues, Colored Plates, CALXNDABS. POST CABDB. KTC. O HIGH CLASS ENGRAVINGS of ALL KINDS Send for OstaloKue. VREDENBURGduCO. ROCHnmEB NSW YORK Mention The Review when you write. amendment. On cauliflower seed $1 a pound is outrageous; 25 cents is ample, 50 cents the limit." (Mr. Northrup evidently is expressing his opinion of the recommendation made to the house committee on Ways .and Means; in the Aldrich bill cauliflower is on the free list.—Ed.) Burpee & Co. W. Atlee Burpee, of Burpee & Co., Philadelphia, writes: "It will be a great mistake if any leading seedsmen trying to secure entirely ideal tariff on seeds should make such objections to the rates specified in tho

Note About Images

Please note that these images are extracted from scanned page images that may have been digitally enhanced for readability - coloration and appearance of these illustrations may not perfectly resemble the original work.
Date
Source

https://www.flickr.com/photos/internetarchivebookimages/16679628402/

Author Internet Archive Book Images
Permission
(Reusing this file)
At the time of upload, the image license was automatically confirmed using the Flickr API. For more information see Flickr API detail.
Flickr tags
InfoField
  • bookid:5205536_23_2
  • bookyear:
  • bookdecade:
  • bookcentury:
  • booksubject:Floriculture
  • bookpublisher:Chicago_Florists_Pub_Co
  • bookcontributor:University_of_Illinois_Urbana_Champaign
  • booksponsor:University_of_Illinois_Urbana_Champaign
  • bookleafnumber:850
  • bookcollection:microfilm
  • bookcollection:additional_collections
  • BHL Collection



Licensing

[edit]
This image was taken from Flickr's The Commons. The uploading organization may have various reasons for determining that no known copyright restrictions exist, such as:
  1. The copyright is in the public domain because it has expired;
  2. The copyright was injected into the public domain for other reasons, such as failure to adhere to required formalities or conditions;
  3. The institution owns the copyright but is not interested in exercising control; or
  4. The institution has legal rights sufficient to authorize others to use the work without restrictions.

More information can be found at https://flickr.com/commons/usage/.


Please add additional copyright tags to this image if more specific information about copyright status can be determined. See Commons:Licensing for more information.
This image was originally posted to Flickr by Internet Archive Book Images at https://flickr.com/photos/126377022@N07/16679628402. It was reviewed on 9 October 2015 by FlickreviewR and was confirmed to be licensed under the terms of the No known copyright restrictions.

9 October 2015

File history

Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.

Date/TimeThumbnailDimensionsUserComment
current13:40, 9 October 2015Thumbnail for version as of 13:40, 9 October 20151,630 × 1,940 (290 KB) (talk | contribs)== {{int:filedesc}} == {{information |description={{en|1=<br> '''Title''': Florists' review (microform)<br> '''Identifier''': 5205536_23_2 ([https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ASearch&profile=default&fulltext=Search&search=insourc...

There are no pages that use this file.