File:Flickr - boellstiftung - Dietmar Lindenberger (3).jpg
![File:Flickr - boellstiftung - Dietmar Lindenberger (3).jpg](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/e/ec/Flickr_-_boellstiftung_-_Dietmar_Lindenberger_%283%29.jpg/800px-Flickr_-_boellstiftung_-_Dietmar_Lindenberger_%283%29.jpg?20101115234854)
Original file (4,256 × 2,832 pixels, file size: 6.74 MB, MIME type: image/jpeg)
Captions
Captions
Summary
[edit]DescriptionFlickr - boellstiftung - Dietmar Lindenberger (3).jpg |
Foto: CC-BY-SA Stephan Roehl / Heinrich-Böll-Stiftung Energiewende mit Atom Mythos oder Notwendigkeit? am 30.09.2010 Durch die gerade beschlossene Laufzeitverlängerung der 17 deutschen Atomkraftwerke ist die Diskussion um die Atomkraft neu entbrannt. Die Regierung meint, Atom sei eine notwendige Brückentechnologie zur Versorgung aus Erneuerbaren Energien. Mycle Schneider, international tätiger Energie- und Atomexperte, hält das in seinem Beitrag für die Publikation der Heinrich-Böll-Stiftung Mythos Atomkraft – ein Wegweiser für einen Mythos: Atomkraft sei keine Brücke, sondern blockiere im Gegenteil den Ausbau Erneuerbarer Energien. Anlässlich der Aktualisierung und Ergänzung der Publikation Mythos Atomkraft hat die Heinrich-Böll-Stiftung Wissenschaftler und Politiker eingeladen, um das Für und Wider einer Laufzeitverlängerung zu diskutieren. Mit: Dr. Dietmar Lindenberger, Geschäftsführer amEnergiewirtschaftlichen Institut an der Universität zu Köln und Co-Autor des Energieszenarios der Bundesregierung Thomas Bareiß, MdB, Energiekoordinator der CDU/CSU-Bundestagsfraktion Sylvia Kotting-Uhl, MdB, Atompolitische Sprecherin der Bundestagsfraktion Bündnis 90/Die Grünen Mycle Schneider, Energieberater und Atomexperte, Co-Autor des Beitrages „Systeme für den Wandel: Kernenergie kontra Energieeffizienz und Erneuerbare?“ in: Mythos Atomkraft – ein Wegweiser Moderation: Ralf Fücks, Vorstand Heinrich-Böll-Stiftung |
Date | |
Source | Dietmar Lindenberger |
Author | Heinrich Böll Stiftung from Berlin, Deutschland |
Camera location | 52° 31′ 26.17″ N, 13° 22′ 58.68″ E ![]() | View this and other nearby images on: OpenStreetMap | ![]() |
---|
Licensing
[edit]![w:en:Creative Commons](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/7/79/CC_some_rights_reserved.svg/90px-CC_some_rights_reserved.svg.png)
![attribution](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/1/11/Cc-by_new_white.svg/24px-Cc-by_new_white.svg.png)
![share alike](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/d/df/Cc-sa_white.svg/24px-Cc-sa_white.svg.png)
- You are free:
- to share – to copy, distribute and transmit the work
- to remix – to adapt the work
- Under the following conditions:
- attribution – You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- share alike – If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same or compatible license as the original.
![]() |
This image, originally posted to Flickr, was reviewed on 15 November 2010 by the administrator or reviewer Zil, who confirmed that it was available on Flickr under the stated license on that date. |
File history
Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.
Date/Time | Thumbnail | Dimensions | User | Comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
current | 23:48, 15 November 2010 | ![]() | 4,256 × 2,832 (6.74 MB) | Boing-boing (talk | contribs) | {{Information |Description=Foto: CC-BY-SA Stephan Roehl / Heinrich-Böll-Stiftung Energiewende mit Atom Mythos oder Notwendigkeit? am 30.09.2010 Durch die gerade beschlossene Laufzeitverlängerung der 17 deutschen Atomkraftwerke ist die Diskussion um d |
You cannot overwrite this file.
File usage on Commons
There are no pages that use this file.
Metadata
This file contains additional information such as Exif metadata which may have been added by the digital camera, scanner, or software program used to create or digitize it. If the file has been modified from its original state, some details such as the timestamp may not fully reflect those of the original file. The timestamp is only as accurate as the clock in the camera, and it may be completely wrong.
Camera manufacturer | NIKON CORPORATION |
---|---|
Camera model | NIKON D700 |
Exposure time | 1/125 sec (0.008) |
F-number | f/4 |
ISO speed rating | 2,200 |
Date and time of data generation | 20:35, 30 September 2010 |
Lens focal length | 200 mm |
Horizontal resolution | 240 dpi |
Vertical resolution | 240 dpi |
Software used | Ver.1.00 |
File change date and time | 17:51, 6 October 2010 |
Exposure Program | Manual |
Exif version | 2.21 |
Date and time of digitizing | 20:35, 30 September 2010 |
APEX shutter speed | 6.965784 |
APEX aperture | 4 |
APEX exposure bias | 0 |
Maximum land aperture | 3 APEX (f/2.83) |
Subject distance | 5.96 meters |
Metering mode | Spot |
Light source | Tungsten (incandescent light) |
Flash | Flash fired, strobe return light detected, compulsory flash firing |
DateTimeOriginal subseconds | 25 |
DateTimeDigitized subseconds | 25 |
Sensing method | One-chip color area sensor |
Custom image processing | Normal process |
Exposure mode | Manual exposure |
White balance | Manual white balance |
Digital zoom ratio | 1 |
Focal length in 35 mm film | 200 mm |
Scene capture type | Standard |
Contrast | Normal |
Saturation | Normal |
Sharpness | Normal |
Subject distance range | Unknown |