File:El Palacio (1921) (14784991493).jpg

Identifier: n03elpalacio12archuoft (find matches)
Title: El Palacio
Year: 1921 (1920s)
Authors: Archaeological Society of New Mexico Museum of New Mexico School of American Research (Santa Fe, N.M.)
Subjects:
Publisher: Santa Fe, N.M
Contributing Library: Robarts - University of Toronto
Digitizing Sponsor: University of Toronto

View Book Page: Book Viewer
About This Book: Catalog Entry
View All Images: All Images From Book
Click here to view book online to see this illustration in context in a browseable online version of this book.

Text Appearing Before Image:
ibited were typical andrespresentative and justihed the judgmentof Dr. C. T. Currelly of the TorontoMuseum that it represented the highestattainment m pottery design and formon the Western continent and m somerespects surpassing the choicest exist-ing specimens of the ancient worid inEurope. SOCIETiES AND CONVENTIONS Friends of Art at San Diego. The Friends of Art at San Diegohave organized a chapter of theAmerican Federation of Arts and havealready been instrumental in securingseveral worth while exhibits for theSan Diego Museum. Annual Institute Meeting. At the annual meeting of the Arch-aeological Institute of America at theUniversity of Michigan, Ann Arbor,Dr. J. W. Magoffin of Johns HopkinsUniversity was elected President to suc-ceed Dr. J. C Egbert, and Dr. D. M.Robinson was elected secretary to suc-ced Dr. G. M. Whicher of HunterCollege. The Santa Fe Society wasrepresented by Dr. Edgar L. Hewettand Mrs. Charles A. Spiess. The meet-ing proved to be a great success. 38 EL PALACIO
Text Appearing After Image:
CQ a o field, has also been productive of muchlight on these subjects and its publi-cations are of the greatest valué. The decisions of the Supreme Courtof New México whcn a territoiy, uni-formly held that the Pueblo Indians ofNew México, were at the date of theTreaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo, citizensof the Mexican Republic, and by virtueof the provisions of that treaty becomecitizens of the United States, none of them having elected to retain thecharacter of Mexican citizens, as provid-ed for in the treaty. These early decisions, in myjudgment,dealmg with the question of citizenshiphave served only to créate misunder-standing and have befogged many mtheir struggle to determine the exactpolítica! status of the Pueblo Indian atthe date of the Treaty and his rightsand powers under that instrnment. EL PALACIO 39 Cilizenship nct the Main Question. Whether or not the Pueblo Indianwas a Citizen of Spain, of México or ofthe United States after the treaty ofGuadalupe, is not the main quest

Note About Images