File:Effectiveness of interventions in studies included in a review comparing efficacy of interventions in reducing belief in conspiracy theories.png
From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
![File:Effectiveness of interventions in studies included in a review comparing efficacy of interventions in reducing belief in conspiracy theories.png](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/3/3a/Effectiveness_of_interventions_in_studies_included_in_a_review_comparing_efficacy_of_interventions_in_reducing_belief_in_conspiracy_theories.png/256px-Effectiveness_of_interventions_in_studies_included_in_a_review_comparing_efficacy_of_interventions_in_reducing_belief_in_conspiracy_theories.png?20230608214321)
Size of this preview: 256 × 599 pixels. Other resolutions: 102 × 240 pixels | 205 × 480 pixels | 328 × 768 pixels | 438 × 1,024 pixels | 2,250 × 5,262 pixels.
Original file (2,250 × 5,262 pixels, file size: 2.92 MB, MIME type: image/png)
File information
Structured data
Captions
Captions
From the study "The efficacy of interventions in reducing belief in conspiracy theories: A systematic review"
Summary
[edit]DescriptionEffectiveness of interventions in studies included in a review comparing efficacy of interventions in reducing belief in conspiracy theories.png |
English: "From the 25 studies included in our review, we extracted 48 intervention comparisons (k) in total (see Table 1). The outcome measure of interest was the Cohen’s d effect size. For all papers that used paired group designs, the Cohen’s d had already been reported. Where the Cohen’s d was not reported in a study, we calculated the d value for the independent group designs using the mean difference and the pooled standard deviation [38]. The Cohen’s d was calculated for each comparison using Microsoft Excel. Where there was insufficient data to calculate the d value, statistical significance was used to indicate whether the intervention successfully induced any change in belief. Quality assessment was conducted using the Risk of Bias Tool 2 (Sterne et al., 2019, see S1 Fig) [39]. To avoid repetition, the Risk of Bias was applied to the 25 studies as opposed to each comparator, as each comparator was subject to same randomisation process and measurement within their respective studies."
The study reviews the experimental studies on this conducted in science so far (not that many; varying quality; varying participants; varying theories; varying group sizes). |
Date | |
Source | https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0280902 |
Author | Authors of the study: Cian O’Mahony, Maryanne Brassil, Gillian Murphy, Conor Linehan |
Licensing
[edit]![w:en:Creative Commons](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/7/79/CC_some_rights_reserved.svg/90px-CC_some_rights_reserved.svg.png)
![attribution](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/1/11/Cc-by_new_white.svg/24px-Cc-by_new_white.svg.png)
This file is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.
- You are free:
- to share – to copy, distribute and transmit the work
- to remix – to adapt the work
- Under the following conditions:
- attribution – You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
File history
Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.
Date/Time | Thumbnail | Dimensions | User | Comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
current | 21:43, 8 June 2023 | ![]() | 2,250 × 5,262 (2.92 MB) | Prototyperspective (talk | contribs) | Uploaded a work by Authors of the study: Cian O’Mahony , Maryanne Brassil, Gillian Murphy, Conor Linehan from https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0280902 with UploadWizard |
You cannot overwrite this file.
File usage on Commons
There are no pages that use this file.
Metadata
This file contains additional information such as Exif metadata which may have been added by the digital camera, scanner, or software program used to create or digitize it. If the file has been modified from its original state, some details such as the timestamp may not fully reflect those of the original file. The timestamp is only as accurate as the clock in the camera, and it may be completely wrong.
Horizontal resolution | 118.11 dpc |
---|---|
Vertical resolution | 118.11 dpc |