File:Drawing (BM 1895,0915.437 1).jpg

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Original file(1,167 × 1,264 pixels, file size: 370 KB, MIME type: image/jpeg)

Captions

Captions

Add a one-line explanation of what this file represents

Summary

[edit]
drawing   (Wikidata search (Cirrus search) Wikidata query (SPARQL)  Create new Wikidata item based on this file)
Title
drawing
Description
English: The prophet David playing a Psaltery, seated and turned to right
Pen and brown ink, with purple wash, over stylus indications, some ruled, on vellum with the blank areas such as the halo burnished (?)
Depicted people Representation of: King David (?)
Date circa 1430
date QS:P571,+1430-00-00T00:00:00Z/9,P1480,Q5727902
Medium vellum
Dimensions
Height: 197 millimetres
Width: 178 millimetres
institution QS:P195,Q6373
Current location
Prints and Drawings
Accession number
1895,0915.437
Notes

The attribution to Fra Angelico can only be traced back to1866 when it was sold as such in the Wellesley sale. This is one of the few drawings that most critics agree has the best chance of being by Fra Angelico. Despite Bernard Berenson's description of it as 'the only drawing by Fra Angelico which leaves no grounds for doubt', John Pope-Hennessy in the first edition of his monograph on the artist attributed it to the artist's pupil Zanobi Strozzi (1412-1468). The absence of drawings by Fra Angelico make it impossible to be totally confident that the BM work is by him, however the physical type of the prophet with his tightly curled mass of curls and delicate features are comparable with those in the artist's paintings from around 1430: compare, for example, the predella panels of the 'Santa Lucia' altarpiece of c. 1429-30 (no. 25, pp. 121-32 in Metropolitan catalogue) and those in the Louvre 'Coronation of the Virgin' of about 1432-4 (illustrated in colour p. 140 in Metropolitan catalogue).

Popham and Pouncey's contention that that the writing on the verso was much earlier in date, and the artist has merely used a piece of waste parchment, went against Berenson's idea that the drawing was a cutting from a psalter or Book of Psalms. Pia Palladino's entry in the recent Metropolitan show conclusively proved that Berenson was correct. The verso, originally the recto (it is written on the smooth side of the vellum) contains an index on the left giving the list of hymns and Psalms to be recited at the appropriate times of day, followed by the incipit (ie. the opening lines) on the right: 'In Christi nomine amen. Incipit psalterium secundum morem et consuetudimen romane curiae' ('In the name of Christ. Amen. Here begins the psalter according to the customs and uses of the Roman curia). Below this is written: 'Ad nocturnum. Psalmus David' ('At nocturns. The Psalm of David'). Fra Angelico's drawing on the other side would have faced Psalm 1 'Beatus vir' ('Blessed is the man'). Book of Psalms of the period frequently began with an image of King David because he was believed to be the Psalms's author.

In some areas, such as the lateral ends of the bench, the front part of the raised dias on which David is seated and David's halo, the surface of the vellum appears to have been burnished so that it stands out from the unburnished vellum. This would presumably have been done before the pen and wash was applied.

Lit.: J.C. Robinson, 'Descriptive Catalogue of Drawings by the Old Masters, forming the Collection of John Malcolm of Poltalloch, Esq.', London, 1876, no. 1; B. Berenson, 'Drawings of the Florentine Painters', Chicago, 1938, II, no. 162; A.E. Popham and P. Pouncey, 'Italian drawings in the BM, the fourteenth and fifteenth centuries', London, 1950, I, no. 2 (with previous literature), II, pl. I; J. Pope-Hennessy, 'Fra Angelico', London, 1952, p. 205 (as Zanobi Strozzi); M. Salmi, 'Il Beato Angelico', Spoleto, 1958, p. 124; L. Grassi, 'I disegni italiani del Trecento e Quattrocento: scuole fiorentina, senese, marchigiana, umbra', Venice, n.d [1960?], no. 21 (as Zanobi Strozzi); S. Orlandi, 'Il Beato Angelico. Note chronologico', "Rivista d'Arte", 29, 1954, pp. 157 and 164; P. Pouncey, review of 1961 edition of Berenson's 'Drawings of the Florentine Painters', "Master Drawings", 3, 1964, p. 282; B. Degenhart and A. Schmitt, 'Corpus der italienischen Zeichnungen, 1300-1450, Süd-und Mittelitalien', Berlin, 1968, I-2, no. 369, I-4, pl. 307b; J. Pope-Hennessy, 'Fra Angelico' (2nd. edition), London, 1974, p. 235; J. Rowlands (ed.), in exhib. cat., BM, 'Master Drawings and Watercolours in the BM', 1984, no. 1; H. Chapman, in exhib. cat., BM, 'Old Master Drawings from the Malcolm Collection', 1996, no. 2; G. Bonsanti, 'Fra Angelico: catalogo completo', Florence, 1998, no. XX, p. XX; Pia Palladino, in exhib. cat., New York, The Metropolitan Museum of Art, 'Fra Angelico', 2005, no. 26, pp. 133-4; C. Van Cleave, 'Master Drawings of the Italian Renaissance', London, 2007, p. 34, illustrated p. 35; H. Chapman and M. Faietti, exhib. cat., BM, London, `Fra Angelico to Leonardo: Italian Renaissance Drawings`, 2010, no. 10, pp. 110-11 (cat. entry by M. M. Rook).

Popham & Pouncey 1950 In his second edition Berenson reaffirms his original opinion that this is "the only drawing by Fra Angelico which leaves no ground for doubt". In quality it certainly stands as high as any other sheet attributed to the master. It should be noted that the present drawing provides no evidence that Fra Angelico worked as an illuminator of manuscripts: the script on the verso stops short and it is clear that the artist merely made use of a piece of waste parchment.

Literature: JCR 1; BB 162, fig. 17 and pl. 11 of 1st ed.; B.M. Guide, 1895, no. 13; L. Douglas, Fra Angelico, 1900, p. 199; F. Schottmüller, Fra Angelico (Klassiker der Kunst), 1911, repr. p. xxx; L. Douglas, note to Crowe and Cavalcaselle, iv, p. 104; Van Marle, x, p. 140.
Source/Photographer https://www.britishmuseum.org/collection/object/P_1895-0915-437
Permission
(Reusing this file)
© The Trustees of the British Museum, released as CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
Other versions

Licensing

[edit]
This image is in the public domain because it is a mere mechanical scan or photocopy of a public domain original, or – from the available evidence – is so similar to such a scan or photocopy that no copyright protection can be expected to arise. The original itself is in the public domain for the following reason:
Public domain

This work is in the public domain in its country of origin and other countries and areas where the copyright term is the author's life plus 100 years or fewer.


This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published (or registered with the U.S. Copyright Office) before January 1, 1929.


This tag is designed for use where there may be a need to assert that any enhancements (eg brightness, contrast, colour-matching, sharpening) are in themselves insufficiently creative to generate a new copyright. It can be used where it is unknown whether any enhancements have been made, as well as when the enhancements are clear but insufficient. For known raw unenhanced scans you can use an appropriate {{PD-old}} tag instead. For usage, see Commons:When to use the PD-scan tag.


Note: This tag applies to scans and photocopies only. For photographs of public domain originals taken from afar, {{PD-Art}} may be applicable. See Commons:When to use the PD-Art tag.

File history

Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.

Date/TimeThumbnailDimensionsUserComment
current20:30, 12 May 2020Thumbnail for version as of 20:30, 12 May 20201,167 × 1,264 (370 KB)Copyfraud (talk | contribs)British Museum public domain uploads (Copyfraud/BM) Drawings on vellum in the British Museum 1430 image 2 of 3 #329/1,318

The following page uses this file:

Metadata