File:Die Porta Martis, auch Porta Nigra gennant (BM 1993,0620.2).jpg

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Original file (2,500 × 2,109 pixels, file size: 1.1 MB, MIME type: image/jpeg)

Captions

Captions

Add a one-line explanation of what this file represents

Summary

[edit]
Die Porta Martis, auch Porta Nigra gennant   (Wikidata search (Cirrus search) Wikidata query (SPARQL)  Create new Wikidata item based on this file)
Artist

Print made by: Johann Anton Ramboux

Printed by: Joseph Selb
Title
Die Porta Martis, auch Porta Nigra gennant
Description
English: The Porta Martis, also called Porta Nigra, with two figures lower right; plate 1 of Heft I of "Malerische Ansichten der merkwürdigsten Alterthümer und vorzüglicher Naturanlagen im Moselthale bey Trier", Trier, 1824-27. 1824
Lithograph with tint-stone
Date 1824
date QS:P571,+1824-00-00T00:00:00Z/9
Medium paper
Dimensions
Height: 381 millimetres
Width: 502 millimetres
institution QS:P195,Q6373
Current location
Prints and Drawings
Accession number
1993,0620.2
Notes

Text from Antony Griffiths and Frances Carey, exhib.cat., BM, London, 'German Printmaking in the Age of Goethe', BM 1994, no. 131:

Trier possesses some of the most imposing Roman remains in northern Europe, including an Imperial palace, baths and amphitheatre, as well as the famous Porta Nigra. This had been built as the main gate to the city in the second century AD, but in the Middle Ages had been blocked up, and incorporated into a monastery. Napoleon had ordered its restoration in order to provide an imperial gateway into Germany, and after 1815, when Trier became part of the Prussian kingdom, King Friedrich Wilhelm III personally took an interest in the freeing of the Roman structure from the medieval church that had been built on top, an operation in which Schinkel was consulted. This had been completed, and the gate brought back into use again in 1822, just before Ramboux's return from Italy. He had already made an aquatint of the Porta Nigra in 1814 (Trier 1991 cat. 1), and must have decided to make a larger series of lithographs soon after his arrival.

By November 1823 he had completed enough drawings to set off to Munich, in order to draw them himself on lithographic stones at the establishment of Joseph Anton Selb (1784-1832). Selb had in 1815 taken over Zeller's first lithographic shop, and was currently working with Mannlich on the continuation of the Munich Gallery that Strixner had recently abandoned (see 1854,1020.1443). Ramboux travelled through Frankfurt, where he saw his old friend from his days in Rome, J. F. Böhmer (see Griffiths & Carey 1994, cat. 121), who in a letter to J.D.Passavant of 25 January 1824 reported his intention "to begin a large lithographic work, which will show the antiquities, art and nature of Trier and its surrounds. He is in a position to produce a series of pictures that embraces all branches of art and all centuries. His landscape drawings (for he brought a fair collection of drawings with him) did not appeal to me very much; but his architectural ones, among them two views of the Porta Nigra, are some of the finest that I ever saw of their kind. Their scale and style are roughly similar to Piranesi." In a letter to Ramboux himself on 24 March 1824, Böhmer continued to enthuse: "I hope that a good number of your masterly drawings are now lithographed. I particularly enjoy the architectural ones which seem to me to be much superior to the landscapes, and to be among the very best of their kind."

Ramboux's determination to draw on the stone himself was unusual at this time: lithography was still underdeveloped, and most artists were happy to leave specialists like Strixner or Piloty to perform this tricky task. Another Trier painter, Anton Joseph Dräger, who saw Ramboux at work in December 1823, was shocked: "It is sad that the public is so backward that such a worthy painter in which it could take pride, is left alone to himself, so that in order to earn a living he has to take up such an unworthy task. I have a horror of finding myself in such a position" (Zahn p.33).

Ramboux felt quite differently, and even drew attention to his role: each print is lettered "Drawn from nature and on the stone by J. A. Ramboux". The lithographs are in fact superior to the drawings (most of which survive at Trier), and Ramboux introduced many felicitous changes as he worked on the stone. Böhmer was right to compare the architectural plates to Piranesi. The landscapes, which he did not like so much, are also remarkable. The broad sweeping vistas combine a classicising approach to landscape with anecdotal detail in the manner of Bruegel. Goethe welcomed the set in a review in 'Über Kunst und Alterthum', 1825, vol.v, Heft 2, pp. 188-91, and their quality is incomparably superior to that of a conventionally picturesque set of views printed in the same year by Christoph Hawich under the title 'Triers Alterthümer und Umgebungen' at a lithographic press that he had himself just established in Trier. Ramboux painted a portrait of Alois Senefelder in 1831 (formerly Cologne, repr. Trier 1991 p. 79).

The series was announced in Schorn's 'Kunstblatt' for 14 March 1825, and the information given there was corrected on 25 April: eight parts were planned, the first four devoted to buildings from antiquity and the later four to the Middle Ages: subscribers could take the whole or just one of the two series. Each part was to have two pictures of buildings, and two of landscapes. The plates were accompanied by a text written by his brother-in-law, Johann Hugo Wyttenbach (1767-1848), who was the leading antiquarian of Trier. The fourth part in 1827 was the last to appear, but Ramboux clearly intended to continue because he went on making drawings of the medieval remains for another two years. The most likely reason why the project was abandoned is lack of money: an undated letter from Wyttenbach makes clear that Ramboux was shouldering the entire costs himself, and that they were very heavy (Trier 1991 p.65).
Source/Photographer https://www.britishmuseum.org/collection/object/P_1993-0620-2
Permission
(Reusing this file)
© The Trustees of the British Museum, released as CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

Licensing

[edit]
This image is in the public domain because it is a mere mechanical scan or photocopy of a public domain original, or – from the available evidence – is so similar to such a scan or photocopy that no copyright protection can be expected to arise. The original itself is in the public domain for the following reason:
Public domain

This work is in the public domain in its country of origin and other countries and areas where the copyright term is the author's life plus 100 years or fewer.


This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published (or registered with the U.S. Copyright Office) before January 1, 1929.


This tag is designed for use where there may be a need to assert that any enhancements (eg brightness, contrast, colour-matching, sharpening) are in themselves insufficiently creative to generate a new copyright. It can be used where it is unknown whether any enhancements have been made, as well as when the enhancements are clear but insufficient. For known raw unenhanced scans you can use an appropriate {{PD-old}} tag instead. For usage, see Commons:When to use the PD-scan tag.


Note: This tag applies to scans and photocopies only. For photographs of public domain originals taken from afar, {{PD-Art}} may be applicable. See Commons:When to use the PD-Art tag.

File history

Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.

Date/TimeThumbnailDimensionsUserComment
current12:57, 16 May 2020Thumbnail for version as of 12:57, 16 May 20202,500 × 2,109 (1.1 MB)Copyfraud (talk | contribs)British Museum public domain uploads (Copyfraud/BM) Coloured lithographs in the British Museum 1824 #18,404/21,781

Metadata