File:Cyclist fatality scene. Eastway,outside the Olympic Park - 180 degree turn between Eastway and the slip-road (7712775894).jpg
![File:Cyclist fatality scene. Eastway,outside the Olympic Park - 180 degree turn between Eastway and the slip-road (7712775894).jpg](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/a/a1/Cyclist_fatality_scene._Eastway%2Coutside_the_Olympic_Park_-_180_degree_turn_between_Eastway_and_the_slip-road_%287712775894%29.jpg/800px-Cyclist_fatality_scene._Eastway%2Coutside_the_Olympic_Park_-_180_degree_turn_between_Eastway_and_the_slip-road_%287712775894%29.jpg?20131213181056)
Original file (1,306 × 979 pixels, file size: 232 KB, MIME type: image/jpeg)
Captions
Captions
Summary
[edit]DescriptionCyclist fatality scene. Eastway,outside the Olympic Park - 180 degree turn between Eastway and the slip-road (7712775894).jpg |
I visited this junction . i was horrified that I almost went under bus no TA647 as it shot a pedestrian crossing for which I had a green right of way for pedestrians and cyclists. It seems to me that a bus or car has a right of way and after a sudden 180 degree turn there is a poorly visible (it has directional vanes on it) traffic signal which may very well be at red. It needs to be ascertained whether the green right of way at the pedestrian crossing coincides with a right of way at the westbound stop line on Eastway. If so, then this is a very serious traffic engineering design fault, especially since vehicles turning 180 degrees at perhaps 20 mph have a limited time and visibility to react to a sudden red phase immediately after a green light. Or had TA647 gone through two red lights? Or more worryingly, had it gone through green or turning yellow at the same time I had a green at the pedestrian junction? The London Cycling Campaign has a particularly helpful photo from th flyover although its concerns are about other aspects of the cycling routes across this effective barrier to cycling. BBC video here: www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-19101983 www.hackneygazette.co.uk/news/death_of_cyclist_who_collid... Death of cyclist who collided with an Olympics bus in Hackney Wick was “inevitable” Syma Mohammed Wednesday, March 20, 2013 2:14 PM A cyclist was killed in an “inevitable” collision as he attempted to overtake an Olympics bus, an inquest heard. Daniel Harris was trying to squeeze past the bus on August 1 last year but there was no room, according to a witness statement read out at Poplar Coroner’s Court. Mr Harris, 28, a social media strategist who worked in Scrutton Street, Shoreditch, collided with the media shuttle bus at the junction of Ruckholt Road (A106) and the East Cross Route (A12) in Hackney Wick. The statement, from an Italian journalist on board the bus, read: “I saw a man coming from the corner. He was clearly trying to overtake the bus. “There was no space between the pavement and the bus. The collision was inevitable.” Mr Harris’s father David spoke to describe the cyclist as “a perfect son” who “enjoyed life”. He added that Daniel was planning to get married to girlfriend Cecilia Dominici, who was present at the inquest. The court also heard how Mr Harris, from Ilford, would have died “instantaneously”, as the cause of death was given as a combination of traumatic injuries. Bus driver Derek Buckland told the inquest how he had been ferrying journalists from the Olympic media centre to the Excel Centre. At around 7:30pm, he pulled up at traffic lights on Ruckholt Road and was making a left-hand turn onto the A12 dual carriageway. “It’s such a tight turn so I positioned off the kerb”, he said. “I wanted to turn left. I moved out on the right to allow myself to make the turn. “When the lights changed I did a slow turn. I heard a noise as I was turning and somebody told me to stop the bus.” Pc Darren Case, of the Metropolitan Police’s road death investigation unit, said it was clear from CCTV footage that “Mr Buckland did everything he could have done in his power to follow signs”. He added that it appeared that Mr Harris was not visible when Mr Buckland had checked his mirrors. The coroner, Dr Richard Brittain, returned a verdict of accidental death. |
Date | |
Source |
|
Author | Sludge G |
Licensing
[edit]![w:en:Creative Commons](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/7/79/CC_some_rights_reserved.svg/90px-CC_some_rights_reserved.svg.png)
![attribution](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/1/11/Cc-by_new_white.svg/24px-Cc-by_new_white.svg.png)
![share alike](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/d/df/Cc-sa_white.svg/24px-Cc-sa_white.svg.png)
- You are free:
- to share – to copy, distribute and transmit the work
- to remix – to adapt the work
- Under the following conditions:
- attribution – You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- share alike – If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same or compatible license as the original.
![]() |
This image, originally posted to Flickr, was reviewed on 13 December 2013 by the administrator or reviewer File Upload Bot (Magnus Manske), who confirmed that it was available on Flickr under the stated license on that date. |
File history
Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.
Date/Time | Thumbnail | Dimensions | User | Comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
current | 18:10, 13 December 2013 | ![]() | 1,306 × 979 (232 KB) | File Upload Bot (Magnus Manske) (talk | contribs) | Transferred from Flickr by User:Marcus Cyron |
You cannot overwrite this file.
File usage on Commons
There are no pages that use this file.
Metadata
This file contains additional information such as Exif metadata which may have been added by the digital camera, scanner, or software program used to create or digitize it. If the file has been modified from its original state, some details such as the timestamp may not fully reflect those of the original file. The timestamp is only as accurate as the clock in the camera, and it may be completely wrong.
Camera manufacturer | FUJIFILM |
---|---|
Camera model | FinePix S5800 S800 |
Exposure time | 1/240 sec (0.0041666666666667) |
F-number | f/3.5 |
ISO speed rating | 200 |
Date and time of data generation | 19:30, 4 August 2012 |
Lens focal length | 6.3 mm |
Orientation | Normal |
Horizontal resolution | 72 dpi |
Vertical resolution | 72 dpi |
Software used | Digital Camera FinePix S5800 S800 Ver1.01 |
File change date and time | 19:30, 4 August 2012 |
Y and C positioning | Co-sited |
Exposure Program | Normal program |
Exif version | 2.2 |
Date and time of digitizing | 19:30, 4 August 2012 |
Meaning of each component |
|
Image compression mode | 2 |
APEX shutter speed | 7.9 |
APEX aperture | 3.6 |
APEX brightness | 5.5 |
APEX exposure bias | 0 |
Maximum land aperture | 3.6 APEX (f/3.48) |
Metering mode | Pattern |
Light source | Unknown |
Flash | Flash did not fire, compulsory flash suppression |
Supported Flashpix version | 1 |
Color space | sRGB |
Focal plane X resolution | 5,714 |
Focal plane Y resolution | 5,714 |
Focal plane resolution unit | 3 |
Sensing method | One-chip color area sensor |
File source | Digital still camera |
Scene type | A directly photographed image |
Custom image processing | Normal process |
Exposure mode | Auto exposure |
White balance | Auto white balance |
Scene capture type | Standard |
Sharpness | Normal |
Subject distance range | Unknown |