File:Contributions from the Botanical Laboratory, vol. 9 (1892) (20678885562).jpg

Title: Contributions from the Botanical Laboratory, vol. 9
Identifier: contributionsfro09univ (find matches)
Year: 1892 (1890s)
Authors: University of Pennsylvania. Botanical Laboratory
Subjects: Botany; Botany
Publisher: Philadelphia : University of Pennsylvania Press
Contributing Library: Penn State University
Digitizing Sponsor: Lyrasis Members and Sloan Foundation

View Book Page: Book Viewer
About This Book: Catalog Entry
View All Images: All Images From Book
Click here to view book online to see this illustration in context in a browseable online version of this book.

Text Appearing Before Image:
22 PROCEEDINGS OF THE (Alabama : Mohr^ recorded this species from four counties, and also stated it to be '* abundant on the Warrior table- land/' but his specimens, preserved in the U. S. National Her- barium, all represent P. Carolina.) (Arkansas : Included by Branner and Coville^ in their list, but no specimens are present in the herbaria seen.) Connecticut: Known in two counties, Fairfield, where it may be native, and New London*, where it has escaped. Delaware : Common in New Castle^ County. District of Columbia' : Both varieties once occurred here.
Text Appearing After Image:
Fig. 2. Distribution of Phlox maculata, Illinois: Apparently rather rare, the county list being small: Champaign, La Salle, Lee, Piatt, Stark, Tazewell, Ver- milion. Will, and Woodford. Indiana : Kecorded from 28 counties, although Mr. Charles C. Deam advises me that he does not consider it as really com- mon: Cass, Clark, Decatur, Delaware, Fayette, Gibson, Ham- ilton, Henry, Jackson, Jay, Jefferson, Jennings, Lake, Mar- shall, Miami, Monroe, Montgomery, Posey, Randolph, Ripley, St. Joseph, Scott, Shelby, Tippecanoe, Vigo, Washington, Wayne, and White. 1 Plant Life of Ala. 685. 1901. 2 Ann. Eept. Geol. Survey Ark. 1888: 204. 1891. PHILADELPHIA BOTANICAL CLUB 23 lowA: Frequent in the eastern part, specimens or records having been seen from the counties: Black Hawk, Cerro Gordo, Clinton, Fayette, Floyd, Grundy, Hancock, Henry, Johnson, Jones, Linn, Poweshiek, Story, Winneshiek, and Wright. Kentucky: Both northern and southern varieties are known here, the latter being represented by an unusually narrow-leaved form. Specimens are preserved from 8 coun- ties: Bell, Clark, Fayette, Henderson, Lincoln^ McCreary', Owen, and Rockcastle, although it probably occurs in many others also. Maryland: Common in the central and western portions, the two varieties intermingling; the county list is: Allegany, Baltimore, Cecil^ Frederick, Garrett, Harford^, Howard, Montgomery^, Prince Georges', and St. Marys^ (Massachusetts: Escaped from cultivation in Berkshire' and Bristol' counties.) Minnesota: Extends into the southeastern counties, her- baria containing specimens from Dakota, Dodge, Goodhue, Mower, Olmsted, and Wabasha. (Mississippi : Three records published by Lowe^ are believed to represent maculate-stemmed forms of P. glaberrima,) Missouri: Though sometimes stated to be common in this state, the species must actually be very rare there, as the only specimens seen in all the herbaria examined are from Iron County. New Jersey : The northern variety is abundant throughout, except in the pine-barrens, there being 11 county records: Burlington^ Camden, Cape May^ Gloucester, Hunterdon, Mercer, Middlesex, Monmouth, Ocean, Passaic, and Salem. The material on which the species was founded had been col- lected here by Kalm. New York : Rather rare, only 8 counties being represented by specimens, and some of these are considered by House^ as escapes: Broome, Cattaraugus, Erie, Essex', Hamilton, Lewis, Rensselaer', and Saratoga*. 1 Plants of Miss. 233. 1921. 2 Ann. List Ferns & Fig. Pits. N. Y. St. 580. 1924.

Note About Images