File:Comparison of young foliage of Latua pubiflora ( left ) with that of Dasyphyllum diacanthoides ( right ), showing ease of confusion.jpg
![File:Comparison of young foliage of Latua pubiflora ( left ) with that of Dasyphyllum diacanthoides ( right ), showing ease of confusion.jpg](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/d/db/Comparison_of_young_foliage_of_Latua_pubiflora_%28_left_%29_with_that_of_Dasyphyllum_diacanthoides_%28_right_%29%2C_showing_ease_of_confusion.jpg/648px-Comparison_of_young_foliage_of_Latua_pubiflora_%28_left_%29_with_that_of_Dasyphyllum_diacanthoides_%28_right_%29%2C_showing_ease_of_confusion.jpg?20190814102834)
Original file (2,447 × 2,263 pixels, file size: 1.35 MB, MIME type: image/jpeg)
Captions
Captions
Summary
[edit]DescriptionComparison of young foliage of Latua pubiflora ( left ) with that of Dasyphyllum diacanthoides ( right ), showing ease of confusion.jpg |
English: Comparison of young, leafy, non-flowering shoots of, on the left, Latua pubiflora (Griseb.) Baillon ( family Solanaceae ) and, on the right, Dasyphyllum diacanthoides (D.Don) Cabrera ( family Asteraceae ), juxtaposed to reveal the ease of a potentially dangerous confusion of these two native Chilean medicinal plants, which has frequently resulted in accidental poisonings by Latua of blunt trauma victims who mistook it for Dasyphyllum diacanthoides (which they were seeking as a remedy for their condition). |
Date | |
Source | Own work |
Author | Flobbadob |
Camera location | 50° 31′ 14.19″ N, 4° 14′ 05.88″ W ![]() ![]() | View this and other nearby images on: OpenStreetMap | ![]() |
---|
The Latua specimen on the left ( a small, container-grown plant purchased from a specialist nursery in the county of Herefordshire, U.K. ) was brought to a wholesale specialist nursery in the county of Cornwall, U.K. ( at the time, possibly the only location in the U.K. where a specimen of Dasyphyllum diacanthoides was readily viewable ) with the express purpose of illustrating a dangerous confusion which has occurred quite frequently in Chilean folk medicine. N.B. even when the plants are not in flower they may still be told apart by means of the following features 1.) Latua spines are borne singly, while those of Dasyphyllum diacanthoides are borne in pairs ( as described in the specific name ). 2.) The leaves of Dasyphyllum diacanthoides tend, even when young, to bear a spine at the leaf-tip, while those of Latua do not. 3.) The leaves of Dasyphyllum diacanthoides become much more leathery than those of Latua as they mature, a textural feature absent in only the youngest of foliage. 4.) The leaf veins of Latua ( viewed from below ) tend to be more prominent than those of Dasyphyllum diacanthoides. 5.) The young bark of Latua is striated, while that of Dasyphyllum diacanthoides is finely warty.
Licensing
[edit]![w:en:Creative Commons](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/7/79/CC_some_rights_reserved.svg/90px-CC_some_rights_reserved.svg.png)
![attribution](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/1/11/Cc-by_new_white.svg/24px-Cc-by_new_white.svg.png)
![share alike](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/d/df/Cc-sa_white.svg/24px-Cc-sa_white.svg.png)
- You are free:
- to share – to copy, distribute and transmit the work
- to remix – to adapt the work
- Under the following conditions:
- attribution – You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- share alike – If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same or compatible license as the original.
File history
Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.
Date/Time | Thumbnail | Dimensions | User | Comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
current | 10:28, 14 August 2019 | ![]() | 2,447 × 2,263 (1.35 MB) | Flobbadob (talk | contribs) | User created page with UploadWizard |
You cannot overwrite this file.
File usage on Commons
There are no pages that use this file.
File usage on other wikis
The following other wikis use this file:
- Usage on en.wikipedia.org
Metadata
This file contains additional information such as Exif metadata which may have been added by the digital camera, scanner, or software program used to create or digitize it. If the file has been modified from its original state, some details such as the timestamp may not fully reflect those of the original file. The timestamp is only as accurate as the clock in the camera, and it may be completely wrong.
Camera manufacturer | Apple |
---|---|
Camera model | iPhone 6 |
Exposure time | 1/100 sec (0.01) |
F-number | f/2.2 |
ISO speed rating | 32 |
Date and time of data generation | 18:40, 16 July 2019 |
Lens focal length | 4.15 mm |
Latitude | 50° 31′ 14.19″ N |
Longitude | 4° 14′ 5.88″ W |
Altitude | 241.602 meters above sea level |
Horizontal resolution | 72 dpi |
Vertical resolution | 72 dpi |
Software used | 10.3.2 |
File change date and time | 18:40, 16 July 2019 |
Exposure Program | Normal program |
Exif version | 2.21 |
Date and time of digitizing | 18:40, 16 July 2019 |
Meaning of each component |
|
APEX shutter speed | 6.6450106157113 |
APEX aperture | 2.2750072066878 |
APEX brightness | 5.7956298200514 |
APEX exposure bias | 0 |
Metering mode | Pattern |
Flash | Flash did not fire, compulsory flash suppression |
DateTimeOriginal subseconds | 421 |
DateTimeDigitized subseconds | 421 |
Supported Flashpix version | 1 |
Color space | sRGB |
Sensing method | One-chip color area sensor |
Scene type | A directly photographed image |
Exposure mode | Auto exposure |
White balance | Auto white balance |
Focal length in 35 mm film | 29 mm |
Scene capture type | Standard |
GPS time (atomic clock) | 17:40 |
Speed unit | Kilometers per hour |
Speed of GPS receiver | 0.16 |
Reference for direction of image | True direction |
Direction of image | 162.04419889503 |
Reference for bearing of destination | True direction |
Bearing of destination | 162.04419889503 |
GPS date | 16 July 2019 |