File:Coast watch (1979) (20660195365).jpg

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Original file (2,127 × 1,362 pixels, file size: 920 KB, MIME type: image/jpeg)

Captions

Captions

Add a one-line explanation of what this file represents

Summary

[edit]
Description
English:
1999 hurricane damage in Oak Island, North Carolina

Title: Coast watch
Identifier: coastwatch00uncs_13 (find matches)
Year: 1979 (1970s)
Authors: UNC Sea Grant College Program
Subjects: Marine resources; Oceanography; Coastal zone management; Coastal ecology
Publisher: (Raleigh, N. C. : UNC Sea Grant College Program)
Contributing Library: State Library of North Carolina
Digitizing Sponsor: North Carolina Digital Heritage Center

View Book Page: Book Viewer
About This Book: Catalog Entry
View All Images: All Images From Book
Click here to view book online to see this illustration in context in a browseable online version of this book.

Text Appearing Before Image:
process for a proposed ACOE project. Such projects usually take about 10 years from application to implemen- tation, and parallel CAMA's stringent permit regulations. In the meantime, the county will move forward with a smaller project to pump sand from the Brandt Island sand disposal site onto Indian Beach. A portion of the county's hotel tax will fund the project. Cole says, "I don't think the county vote was against renourish- ment. Rather, it was more about the way this proposal was structured. I think that all citizens of Carteret County understand that this is a critical economic issue for the county." Retreat is Still an Option Time was, that North Carolinians simply retreated in the face of the often powerful combination of nature: storms and the shifting islands, says Carmine Prioli, North Carolina State University English professor. Prioli is the author of Hope for a Good Season: The C'ae Bankers ofHarkers Island. After the storm of 1899, residents of Shackleford Banks picked up and moved to the mainland, leaving the island forever. Now a wilderness area in the Cape Lookout National Seashore, the island is known for its wild horses and breathtaking maritime forest. Other communities along the Outer Banks dealt with advancing seas and erosion in less drastic ways, Prioli says. They simply retreated up the shoreline out of harm's way. A cottage industry of
Text Appearing After Image:
The 1999 hurricane season wrecked havoc on Oak Island - and roads. house movers actually grew out of the retreat policy. In more recent memory, the Cape Hatteras Lighthouse became an icon of the retreat policy, Prioli notes. The nation held its collective breath in March 1999, as the 100-year-old landmark was moved 3,000 feet away from the reach of the sea. Relocation of buildings still is an effective option for some beach property owners. Between 1989 and 1995, about 250 buildings along the coast were moved landward either on the same lot, or to other lots. "Retreat served us well as a policy for generations," says Nags Head Town Manager J. Webb Fuller. It was a policy that most could live with — as long as the population remained low, and home sites were deep enough to accommodate the ebb and flow of the shoreline. Much of the Outer Banks' mush- rooming growth took place between 1975 and 1995, decades of low storm activity. Now, building lots are smaller, houses larger and both are more costly. For many, there may be nowhere to move. "We are constantly juggling erosion, washing away beaches, dunes, homes both chronic and catastrophic," Fuller says. "As a community, we now are looking at beach nourishment as a policy that better fits the economic reality of today." He adds, "Sea walls or bulkheads are just not an option here. The beach is public domain. Once you harden the shorefront, you eliminate the public beach. We have, and the state has, always championed public access." Like his colleagues in the beach and shore association, Fuller would like a dedicated funding source at the state level as leverage for long-term management programs that have the greatest economic and environmental return for citizens and visitors. "The state has a responsibility to its citizens to maintain its infrastructure," Fuller says. "That includes roads, water systems and other assets. And in the case of beach towns, the most valuable asset we have is our beach. We can choose to ignore its maintenance needs, or to maintain it. If we ignore it, it will go away. So it makes sense to look at the quality of all our public resources." □ COASTWATCH 21

Note About Images

Please note that these images are extracted from scanned page images that may have been digitally enhanced for readability - coloration and appearance of these illustrations may not perfectly resemble the original work.
Date
Source

https://www.flickr.com/photos/internetarchivebookimages/20660195365/

Author Internet Archive Book Images
Permission
(Reusing this file)
At the time of upload, the image license was automatically confirmed using the Flickr API. For more information see Flickr API detail.
Flickr tags
InfoField
  • bookid:coastwatch00uncs_13
  • bookyear:1979
  • bookdecade:1970
  • bookcentury:1900
  • bookauthor:UNC_Sea_Grant_College_Program
  • booksubject:Marine_resources
  • booksubject:Oceanography
  • booksubject:Coastal_zone_management
  • booksubject:Coastal_ecology
  • bookpublisher:_Raleigh_N_C_UNC_Sea_Grant_College_Program_
  • bookcontributor:State_Library_of_North_Carolina
  • booksponsor:North_Carolina_Digital_Heritage_Center
  • bookleafnumber:93
  • bookcollection:statelibrarynorthcarolina
  • bookcollection:ncdhc
  • bookcollection:unclibraries
  • bookcollection:americana
  • BHL Collection
Flickr posted date
InfoField
17 August 2015

Licensing

[edit]
This image was taken from Flickr's The Commons. The uploading organization may have various reasons for determining that no known copyright restrictions exist, such as:
  1. The copyright is in the public domain because it has expired;
  2. The copyright was injected into the public domain for other reasons, such as failure to adhere to required formalities or conditions;
  3. The institution owns the copyright but is not interested in exercising control; or
  4. The institution has legal rights sufficient to authorize others to use the work without restrictions.

More information can be found at https://flickr.com/commons/usage/.


Please add additional copyright tags to this image if more specific information about copyright status can be determined. See Commons:Licensing for more information.
This image was originally posted to Flickr by Internet Archive Book Images at https://flickr.com/photos/126377022@N07/20660195365. It was reviewed on 8 October 2015 by FlickreviewR and was confirmed to be licensed under the terms of the No known copyright restrictions.

8 October 2015

File history

Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.

Date/TimeThumbnailDimensionsUserComment
current17:23, 8 October 2015Thumbnail for version as of 17:23, 8 October 20152,127 × 1,362 (920 KB) (talk | contribs)== {{int:filedesc}} == {{information |description={{en|1=<br> '''Title''': Coast watch<br> '''Identifier''': coastwatch00uncs_13 ([https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ASearch&profile=default&fulltext=Search&search=insource%3A%2Fcoa...

There are no pages that use this file.